Let's address the major predictions first and foremost:
-There has been ZERO gov't, ethnic, political, or social fragmentation in Iran. No pro-CIA youth uprising, like they were hoping would take place.
In fact, to the extent that there were internal schisms, they reflected the opposite process-- the takeover of the government by the hardline military / IRGC, who demoted the previous rulers (clerics / diplomats / scholars), while attacking America in the region even harder than before.
And so they just wiped out one base after another, turning the globohomo crusader LARPers into fine red mist, while forcing the Gulf jihadist nations to just sit there and take it like bitches. And all while the Orange Retard wailed impotently on social media!
I guess regime change assassinations really do work.
-It goes without saying, but America is getting wrecked, and will lose here just like it has lost every single other war, going back to WW2. There's nothing shocking there: the outcome is not in doubt, at least not by anyone with a brain.
The funny / amusing thing, though, has been the fact that the bullying from Iran has gotten so bad, that the various right-wing slop outlets and propagandists have literally *dropped* it entirely from their various livestreams, tweets, blog posts, etc. As in, they will not even address it, and refuse to mention it, due to how painful it is for them.
Ironically enough, these guys used to say, 'words can't change reality' and 'facts don't care about your feelings'.
But now they've been forced to collectively plunged their heads in the sand, and just completely tune out reality itself-- and so they are forced to memory-hole and downplay the biggest (and really, the most disastrous) foreign war of all time, even as it unfolds in-front of the whole world, simply because it is too painful for them and their copes.
I guess this is how high school must have felt like, for these seething emo school shooter losers (LOL)!
Get bullied!
[UPDATE:
A further irony is that every time Social Darwinism gets implemented in politics, it always leads to extinction and collective failure, rather than amazing triumphs, out-competing your rivals, etc.
Peter Turchin in War and Peace and War talks about how Machiavelli was a failure in politics, despite his ultra-cynical theories. The Nazis-- easily the most tiresome example-- were into the exact same evolutionary rhetoric and racial fanfic that today's right-wingers are... and lost pathetically, on both fronts.
Not to mention the legions of school shooters who invoke Darwin, alpha / beta males, bla bla bla in their manifestos... while committing suicide for no higher purpose.
So in that sense, I guess it's not that surprising to see today's right-wingers also committing collective suicide, blowing up the foundations of American / Western prosperity, while at the same time bragging about their heritage (which they are demolishing), the survival of the fittest (as they go right off the cliff), the triumph of IQ over barbaric Muzzie ignorance (though they can't handle reality without a series of pathetic coping mechanisms), and so on and so forth...]
I guess some people might be shocked by how vocally opposed I am to this war, or call me anti-American or whatever.
ReplyDeleteThe truth is I do have family members who served in the US military, though not after the 70s / 80s-- that was when they stopped the draft, and also when the military itself started to become more and more of an enormous parasite. Their treatment of veterans speaks for itself: the one consistent category of homeless people (notice how you don't see homeless teachers, nurses, etc).
I've never been anti-military or against the jocks per se, and in fact I remember feeling very sentimental about WW2, the sacrifice and all that. Perhaps overly so, but nevertheless.
But our wars in the M-E do not go anywhere, they cost a ton, lead to big losses on both sides, and on top of that have only become more embarassingly cringe and disgusting, especially in the 21st century.
And the biggest twist is that unlike with Vietnam or other unpopular wars, the leaders of The System don't even bother cooking up some lame propaganda campaign for why we're getting involved, justifying the war by appealing to 'Stopping Communism' or 'Stopping Radical Islam' or whatever other made-up nonexistent eXiSTenTiAl tHrEaT.
Instead, theyr'e upfront and honest about their incel school shooter motivations: they're starting the war with Iran because they enjoy watching normies suffer. This gives them the perfect opportunity to act our their sadistic revenge fantasies, as opposed to the shame on their reputation that would come from blowing up an elementary school at home.
But since they're doing it to the Muzzies, browns, low-IQ, bla bla bla, then it's OK and even justified.
So there is literally no reason to support any of this, if you're not some repulsive / hideous autistic school shooter type. In fact, the harder they amp up the propaganda, the more we're in favor of this scum getting wiped out by Persian missiles. It's no loss to American society, or the rest of the world, for them to be killed.
I used to get mad when I'd see online right-wingers referring to themselves as 'very high IQ'. Not just because of the narcissism (though that too) but because of the stark contrast between their ridiculous branding and their banal / retarded output.
ReplyDeleteHowever it turns out my normalbrain didn't fully understand what the phrase meant. It is in fact a more subtle grammatical structure than I had first thought (LOL).
Basically, the 'very high' part of the sentence doesn't refer to their IQ scores (which they leave unspecified), but rather their current physical state. They are very high-- that is fucked up on multiple substances, like their idol and inspiration Musk who looks down on sobriety as something for normies (not everyone has the luxury of running scam businesses with Indian slave labor)-- and at the same time they have an IQ, probably not above 105, if we're being generous. That is what that sentence actually means.
Hopefully this clears it up for anyone else.
Something else to keep in mind when you hear this IQslop is that brainpower is not some subtle ineffable property that can only be detected via the finest instruments, the subtlest measurements, etc etc etc.
ReplyDeleteIf you're actually smart, we'd pick up on it and notice immediately. Even a 5-min conversation is usually enough to determine how bright / insightful someone is, perhaps not to the point of knowing where precisely he'd score on the test... but enough to get a rough idea.
(Also this is not to say that determines your value as a human being or whatever, only an autist would reduce people to metrics and rankings.)
So if you have to lecture us about how much of a genius you are, while literally nobody else praises you for your insight, originality, intelligence, etc, then guess what, buddy-- YOU'RE NOT SMART. LOL. Such an obvious truth, but apparently Millennials have never learned it!