The dumbest platform

Twitter is basically a gold mine of retardation, and you can literally collect endless cases of just how insane, wrong, and retarded they are about everything. There are more examples I could give, but I want to list some of the most obvious ones, because as far as I know nobody else has done. Also, because it'll help counter-act their insane view of themselves as occupying prime digital real estate or whatever. 

They have a major habit of writing dismissive / smug / cynical sounding posts, where they basically attempt to make some normal behavior come across as beneath them, inferior, irrational etc... only for you to realize that the writer has no clue WTF is going on. Sometimes they get the behavior they're describing precisely backwards. It's like reading a Martian attempting to pierce together human social norms.

They'll come up with convoluted explanations for things that have very simple causes, while thinking that the more complexity they add, the more accurate the final conclusion becomes -- just the opposite, lol. It becomes worthless.

They'll write completely fabricated / totally wrong BS / fan fic in a tone of such smug superiority that it makes it sound as if God Himself had told them personally. Or as if their view were so true that it didn't even require evidence or reasoning to justify (often the mistakes are high school level). This seems to be the result of grade-inflated college degrees. 

They'll attribute some grand long-term cause (like Evolution, Darwin, Female Nature, etc) to things that only started ten or maybe fifteen years ago at the latest. Sometimes they'll even go further and claim that some behavior that is obviously not fitness-enhancing or is maybe even totally destructive is UM AKSHUALLY fitness-enhancing, complete with some retarded made-up vignette of hunter-gatherer life.

They'll problematize and pathologize all kinds of things that are totally normal and natural and helpful, while turning a blind eye or even being in favor of things that are wicked and obviously sick. Sometimes they seem to be judging healthy behavior by the standards of sickness / mental-illness. 

In many cases the discrepancy between their own self-descriptions and the reality is so severe and jarring that you can only really understand what they're saying by flipping the meaning of the words around -- it's like they're so wrong that they almost get it right (almost). Then anyone who points this out has to deal with the inevitable temper tantrum (from some thin-skinned dork who can't handle reality, lol). 

They all seem to think that they belong to a highly exclusive club which the rest of us jealous inferiors are too low status, unintelligent, poor, and so on, to join -- they don't realize the whole world is laughing at them, and nobody takes their lame fan-fic seriously. 

Small update

With a somewhat obligatory reference at the outset.

No, don't be scared, I'm not planning anything crazy. I'm talking about getting in shape mentally. I also want to clean this place up, so that I can eventually show it to my friends and family. And I want to make it more accessible to normies, less infuriating, etc.

In that spirit, I'd like to announce that my previous post was the last one I'll ever write about Millennials. By now the basic patterns are well-established, and are hopefully becoming clear to most people: ego inflation, delusions of grandeur, temper tantrums, blaming Zoomers for the things *they* started, shut-in syndrome / autism / mid-life crisis due to never going outside, witch-hunts, and so on and so forth.

Most of the things you see on social media are variations on those patterns, and it's not as interesting to document the 1134th time they occur, compared to pointing it out the first time. So unless something new comes up that is worth addressing specifically, that content will take a back seat. If you're curious, you can go back and find the posts. 

Plus I'd also like to bury the hatchet, move on with life (hopefully to more interesting things), and that's impossible when you're in warfare mode all the time. And it puts other people on guard, too. So that's it.

As for the new directions and stuff, I'm weary of announcing anything specifically, but other the next few years I plan on studying more math, since that's the area where I'm (relatively) weak. Specifically, differential equations, but all kinds of other stuff too, depending on what piques my interest. Now that I'm in my 20s, I want to take advantage and learn difficult stuff, rather than wait for later, since it would be a lot harder then. So the volume of posts may decrease.

All for now. 

The Millennial midlife crisis

Some people have asked me why I sound so old -- it's not really an affectation (for example, I don't wear a bowtie or LARP as a Victorian gentleman or whatever lol), it's just that I was never into a single trend from the 2010s, because I thought they were all awful and cringe, and was always hostile to them.

It's hard to name all of them, but I've already posted about them, so you have some idea what I'm referring to. 

The point is that, back then, if you weren't seething enough, or overtly weird enough, or emo enough, you were actually slandered by the freaks -- it put a target on your back. So I did get some flak during the 2010s for those reasons (however I'm a very stubborn person and attempts at power-tripping only make me even more defiant and insane). 

Now after all that noise and all that talk about 'get with the times, BOOMER' -- the shoe is on the other foot, and they are the ones who are out-of-touch, lame and repulsive to actual young people, and increasingly needing to whine and blame Zoomers for everything (lol), as their oldness becomes more and more palpable. 

"Going outside? Talking to people? SOCIALIZING WITH NORMIEZZZ? Back in my day, young people were sexless shut-ins who spent their time binge-watching gore compilations on Liveleak! I can't believe you! Delete that post!" 

"You mean you *don't* fantasize about harming other people? Back in my day, hip and cool young people all had a favorite school shooter!"

"You think being weird is BAD????!!! Back in 2017, if you didn't eat garbage..."

And so on and so forth. 

All of this hysteria because they can't accept that 20 year olds in the 2020s don't think of them as cool, and that their influence is waning (the only people I see sucking up to Millennials are the older Zoomers born in the 90s) -- and if you think the situation is bad now, just wait for Gen Alpha.  

In fact, the best thing you can do for yourself as a young person (and for your 'generational brand') is to deliberately disavow whatever trends they're into, and follow the EXACT OPPOSITE of their advice across the board, lol. You'll feel a lot happier!

Like expressing yourself sincerely and not being afraid of being yourself (rather than performative grandiose LARPing / self-hatred and seething rage disguised as irony-poisoning), refusing to eat or indulge in various forms of garbage / weirdness, getting along with other people and especially women rather than picking pointless arguments for the sake of antagonism, growing up and moving on and making peace with the world rather than stewing in revenge fantasies like an 11 yr old child, not behaving like a tribalistic fuckin' zealot over things that are irrelevant, complimenting and being friendly rather than withholding praise and power-tripping, and so on and so forth. 

Get with *these times*, lol, rather than staying stuck in the awful 2010s forever!

A redpill that even the HBD nerds won't feed you

Here's another super-offensive post, which would get me banned on both sides, and especially among the Darwinoid elite-slurping alt-right.  

I want to say that I'm not personally a Jewish Question obsessive (like most non-mentally-broken people), and that I've known some who were very smart and cool, but I also don't regard them as being the master race, and it's worth writing the post just to counter-signal the servile HBD nerds who obsequiously worship higher IQ groups.

I find it annoying how they love to enumerate the multiple ways in which blacks and other non-white groups are inferior, but at the same time they get irrationally angry when you point out that the groups we're told to worship (especially Jews) have their own problems which we do not, or at least not to the same extent.

Since a lot of this slop is directly funded by Peter Thiel, I get the sense that for every potential Einstein they wow you with, there's really a billion Israeli scammers they are waving in to Silicon Valley -- the high IQ slop is to intimidate you by making you feel inferior, so you never point out what's going. However that's politics, and I want to talk about broader things.

To start off with, it's interesting to look at how much of Jewish art and culture revolves around being a neurotic, weird, misunderstood misfit whose anxious obsessions prevent him from enjoying the basic aspects of everyday life that most people can 'get' unconsciously, without dissecting them -- like dating, flirting, humor, small talk, dancing, and so on. Woody Allen, Philip Roth (off the top of my head -- but there are others).

Their creepiness / sex pest behavior / and weirdness around women is also well documented, and seems to be a result of their lack of physicality -- if you think back to high school, it was always the pale awkward uncoordinated misfit types who'd repulse girls the most, whereas jocks did not (just the opposite, actually).  

While Gentile societies also produce people with those problems, such as the pitiful cast of a Dostoevsky novel or Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver or the average nerd, they're nowhere near as big of a fraction of our population as they are among Jews.

I've also heard that they have lower scores on agreeableness and conscientiousness, compared to Gentiles, as well as of course being far more neurotic -- apparently this accounts for their overrepresentation in the hard sciences, too (and not just their higher IQ scores). They have personalities are that are more likely to disregard the consensus, hold nothing sacred, blaze a new trail, etc. 

Unfortunately in our degenerate era, there is a dearth of thinkers who have a more social sciences approach (in the non-BS way), who could point that being more anti-social on average is not a good thing, actually, and especially not for collectively-- the net effect of a whole group of people being both more intelligent (and thus more elite), while also being more anti-social, could be much worse than whatever individual benefits the geniuses they produce give you. But unfortunately everyone in our corrupted world views following the rules, being normal, working hard, as bad things, so nobody can say something as basic and obvious.

Small differences in the mean can lead to huge differences in the tails of a distribution -- so the nerds tell us, when talking about IQ. But apply to personality traits: if their personalities are more anti-social on average, we'd expect Jews to be massively overrepresented when it comes to behaviors that are warped and 'out there' and that are purely parasitic, anti-social, offensive, etc. They will make up a much larger fraction of the 'totally fucked up' share of the population. 

For obvious reasons, there are no studies to this effect (should some angry nerd come demanding evidence), but I honestly think their endless history of scandals and expulsions more or less speaks for itself, in that regard -- it would be beyond the scope of this post to list all of them, but they seem way more likely to glibly sell things which others would regard as sacred in general, including selling off domestic industries, child trafficking as a special case (see the Epstein scandal), and other forms of parasitism (look at the porn industry). 

It's revealing that there are Gentile groups which are also smarter, educated, and higher income -- like WASPs, for example, or the average educated liberal white person, or Euro elites-- who not widely stereotyped as untrustworthy and 'gotta watch your back around them'. Perhaps somewhat out-of-touch and old-fashioned, maybe. This shows you that it's not just behavior that is due to them being more urbanite and thus liberal / WEIRD morality -- they're specifically less moral in general. 

Prominent right-wingers -- conservatives... or libertarians?

I was thinking about making a post on the subject of conservative vs libertarian politics, where the (dun dun dun) obvious conclusion was that most mainstream right-wingers were just deranged libertarians, rather than conservatives, preservers and upholders of America or Western Civ, or whatever. 

However making a Serious Post would require an extensive intro, waffling, teasing, perhaps never reaching the conclusion -- since I don't have the energy for that, I'll write it like I would a comment, and then post it here for greater visibility to infrequent visitors.

For those who are not familiar with the research, the main difference between libs and cons is the disgust response (cons being more sensitive to disgust, libs less so), followed by the fact that conservatives place greater emphasis on purity, taboo, and in-group loyalty, compared to liberals -- see the work done by Jonathan Haidt. 

It turns out that libertarians score even lower on disgust, compared to liberals. And they are numb to the other major moral themes, unlike liberals (who de-emphasize them, compared to conservatives). They are are the most blunted and callous, and the least sensitive to disgust. See here for the evidence / background.

Their moral attitude is also "relatively cerebral as opposed to emotional"-- keep in mind that this is distinct from smart / intellectual (which, on the whole, they are not). It's a kind of nerdy, disembodied, detached / non-visceral style of thinking, which is hostile to intuition / emotion.

Applying these concepts to the current political divide, I think this explains why I find so many right-wingers repulsive, and why they in turn are so enthusiastic about promoting various forms of deviance -- such as out / there bizarre substances, living in your own filth, hyping up incel serial killers and school shooters as if they were saints and heroes, pornography / fetishes, gore and snuff films and torture footage (especially when they target innocent people and/or children), revenge fantasies, and the rest of that warped slop. 

Being libertarians, rather than conservatives, they are totally indifferent to taboo violation (which triggers the disgust response -- something they are incapable of feeling).

Instead the only emotion they feel is outrage and anger. These could, presumably, take the form of justified righteous vengeance or moral indignation at the fucked up state of society -- being a kind of martyr for a higher cause. 

But in practice they never act like this, and probably would scoff at someone who did resonate with such themes: instead it's more like they're addicted to the rush of spite that comes from enforcing some abstract principle ('UM AKSHUALLY'). 

It's individualistic (rather than channeling higher forces), power-tripping (pointlessly over-correcting crimes that are irrelevant in the broader scheme of things), and over-zealous; moreover all this obsession on punishment actually undermines morality, since there is no longer any reason to obey the rules when they are just going to be used to punish you anyway. 

It's also anti-conservative in the sense that it reduces everything to the utilitarian activation of certain receptors in the brain -- constantly stewing in rage, and making the consumption of rage-baiting slop your primary activity, fixating on punishment -- which in turn results in this kind of warped always-on-the-verge-of-going-postal zealot type of personality (anti-natural).  

Their kneejerk response, when they're confronted about their behavior, is along the lines of 'you can't tell me what to do, mannnnn' -- this is because their asocial brains are incapable or hostile to group membership, so they cannot really resonate with moral norms and judgement in general, (which primarily revolve around placing restrictions on individual behavior). Instead, they conceive themselves as bold individual liberated consumers who can do whatever they want.

Of course the interesting irony is that the liberated individuals, who are defined by withdrawing into their own cocoons and consuming various flavors of copium in total isolation, are so devoid of a personality that they are impossible to distinguish from one another (lol). Then as the hedonism becomes the main activity, the primary emotion is actually seething rage, rather than pleasure or joy (which are strangely absent in self-indulgence). 

Finally I also think this framework explains why the dorkazoids are so triggered by minorities, which I always found puzzling -- I don't mean wanting a more homogeneous nation, winding down immigration, feeling alienated due to being surrounded by foreigners, all of which are perfectly compatible with moral conservatism. I mean the characteristic flavor of rage, and getting worked up about the subject, and impotently fantasizing about revenge (as we see with the ICE masturbators). 

It's because they're weak, physically stunted, cerebral nerds, who feel easily threatened by brown / black people, and then spend their lives coping with that impotence through revenge fantasies, lol.  

Notice that they don't mention feeling what most people actually feel when they're surrounded by people who belong to a different ethnic group, speak an entirely different language, follow different customs, etc -- alienation. Most foreign ethnic groups aren't violently hostile, and nor do they practice rituals that are so sick and out there that you'd want to confront them and clean up -- it's more like you don't resonate with them, and that their presence makes you feel isolated and surrounded by strangers. 

However for libertarians, the concept of belonging doesn't make sense (DOES NOT COMPUTE) which means it's also literally beyond them to feel a lack of belonging -- and so, once again, the only emotion they have left is impotent rage. 

It also ties into the one group which is strangely absent from their retarded fantasies-- the homeless. Being surrounded by mentally-ill ex-asylum patients, who are often decomposing or shooting up right on the sidewalk, is a massive threat to normality. It's one of those things that does actually strike most people as needing a campaign / crusade to clean things up (unlike people of a different ethnicity living next to you) -- but once again, normality is not a theme they care about, so they pay no mind or even support it being degraded.

I always wondered, 'what kind of social conservative is seething with rage at the entire concept of normality?!' -- I never understood how you could hate the social order, and uphold being a gay reject... while calling yourself right-wing. Now, however, it makes much more sense. 

For now these are the main examples, but I'll add more in the comments if / when I think of them.