WOAH DUDE, AI SOLVED NAVIER-STOKES!!!

Apologies for being late. When I saw the news about a week ago, I almost choked on my own saliva -- then I immediately rushed to Reddit. 

The collective orgasm was so intense that I had to be put in intensive care. Now that I'm out of the ICU, and have recovered my strength, I finally feel ready to upload my thoughts.

***

I know I said I was studying math, but I can't really comment on fluid dynamics and the nature of solutions and so on, so I won't pretend to know enough about the subject (I am still working through fractions) -- I'd be interested in hearing an actual mathematician's perspective on this issue, but so far it doesn't seem like there are any people with such skills involved in the discourse, so we'll just have to wait and see whether the solution is indeed correct.

However the human interest part of the story I *can* comment about, and that is fairly straightforward.

Essentially, a mathematician did all the real work and original thought, but (unbeknownst to him -- let this be a lesson in cyber-security) the chatbot he was using had some gay clause in it or whatever that deprived him of his rights, and he was really being carefully watched and monitored by some retarded nerd. Then the second he was close to being finished, the seething loser nerd just shamelessly stole all the work, had AI compile it, and then said, 'Artificial Intelligence did this, akshually!'.

Then all the paid slopagandist midwits unanimously went, 'See? See? It is *useful* after all! Shut up and accept the data centers! Eat the bugz! Be a good slave! STOP ASKING QUESTIONS! JUST DO WHAT WE SAY!'

Sorry, dork, it doesn't work like that, lol. 

They can't even make good propaganda anymore -- now it's just retarded nonsense written by shut-in autistic retards, which is so hopelessly out of touch that it is contradicted by basic observable reality, and therefore totally unbelievable for anybody not part of the echo-chamber.

Anyway, as far as I can tell the only real lesson from all this is to never trust nerds, since they are inveterate power-trippers, and to remember that these freakishly pale useless weirdos only have money and status thanks to the fake bubble tech scam economy. Having no skills of their own, they can only steal from other people, or try to appropriate the achievements of their superior predecessors via appeals to distant genetic lineages and IQ scores.

Now that this is joke of an economy is falling apart, it's over for them, and we at least have something to look forward to.   

(Anecdotally, it's revealing how even after many decades of this, you still can't find anybody who views computer nerds as being in the same category as doctors, lawyers, and engineers, in terms of job prestige, respectability, potential marriage value, and so and so forth. 

If your daughter was dating a lawyer, doctor, engineer, etc, you'd say, 'Honey, I think you're making a very good choice.'

If she was dating a computer programmer, no matter how rich, you'd

1) Try to dissuade her

2) Tell her, 'I want you to have this. It's called MACE The eyes, aim at the eyes. Remember to never be alone with that creature.'

In fact, the flow of prestige continues to move in the opposite direction. Boys still dream of becoming engineers. Hell, even the nerds themselves constantly try to rebrand their superfluous hobby as 'Akshaully, engineering', whereas no engineer would ever want to be confused with one of them.)

***

I also can't help but notice that the jobs assigned to AI are almost always the most menial, boring, unimportant, rote tasks in the workplace -- it basically never gets used for anything that requires some degree of creativity or inspiration or thinking outside the box.

So, for example, if some aspect of a proof is necessary in order to lay the foundations for the argument, but at the same time is incredibly tedious and lengthy to write (and therefore omitted when the mathematicians are doing original work)... then AI can usually do that just fine, and faster than a human can.

Or if, when writing notes, the researchers abbreviate things / use shorthand / jump around rather than write a fully publishable document... then the AI can fill in the gaps and assemble the pieces together, at least to some extent (meaning: provided there's enough human-generated original material).

Otherwise, it cannot think for itself, and is never used in order to come up with an original solution for a problem.

All this makes it sound more like a glorified secretary or note-taker or low-paid clerk or intern, rather than super-intelligent transhumanist singularity or whatever -- and when you compare the amount of funding that has been wasted on AI, with what it takes to hire a secretary or menial office worker (or H1B, these days), then the whole thing becomes even more ridiculous. It's work you could get from a human for a much lower price!

And all of this is assuming that it can even perform those low-skilled tasks to the same degree of accuracy that a human can...

In reality, anyone who's had to interact with AI knows it often feels like interacting with a clerk who has dementia, and who occasionally makes embarrassing mental lapses you have to watch out for and correct, while otherwise doing decent work. Or a young intern who is too hormonal to care about the job, and so just concocts plausible-sounding, but ultimately meaningless, nonsense in order to skip work -- it lies, hallucinates, confidently gives the wrong answer, tells you the exact opposite of what the data it has in its source material, and will often continue in its wrong-ness no matter how much you prod and push or hint at the right answer.

Everyone has their own version of this when using AI for Google, which is (again) the actual function that it's been reduced to -- notice how steep the downgrade from 'super-intelligent transcendent machine-god' to 'crappier version of Google's broken search engine' is, lol.

And all that, again, at the expense of trillions of dollars -- ridiculous!

Yes, America is a 3rd world country now

Another Thiel-Musk goo-guzzler network term I see constantly on the timeline is '3rd worldist / ism', which they literally only use when it comes to critics of Israel (lol), similar to how they only invoke Western Civ to justify our failed interventions in the M-E -- they don't know and aren't interested in history, or art, or culture.

Then right as the right-wing morons started beating the audience over the head with 3rd world this and 3rd world that... America itself *became* a textbook 3rd world country, with homeless everywhere, planes falling out of the sky, elite debacles that don't even get acknowledged (let alone fixed), and cringing slaves worshiping Dear Leader (who now resembles a corpse), and all other kinds of dysfunction and corruption.

Somehow all of these symptoms went right over their heads, though (these slopagandists are not the most insightful), and they continued their campaign regardless -- and always in the wrong direction, too, just demanding endless loyalty to their cult, despite them not doing anything good for anyone in the society.

'If you don't support us harder, then you're just a resentful 3rd-worldist, whose pathetic mindset is utterly incompatible with the values of our civilized elite 1st world country...'

*trips over the corpse of a homeless man* 

*a bridge collapses somewhere*

*8th plane crash of the year*

*raped by inflation; too much of a slave to even admit it*

Sorry, dork: we *are* the 3rd world now!

And these copers going on about My Glorious Ancestors this and My Glorious Ancestors that sound exactly like some generic Arab immigrant shouting about the peak of his homeland thousands of years ago under the Abbasid Caliphate, unlike its present day shithole status.

'N-nah, bro, that could never happen here...' 

Right as it happened here, lol -- they thought mediocrity, stagnation, and collapse were related to genes, rather than social cohesion, so now that America is behaving exactly like those places, it's too shattering of their world-view, too brain-breaking and suicide-inducing, so they literally cannot even admit it. Instead they just block it out, and accept the pain like good slaves. That's why the triumphalism always has an undertone of severe desperation.

If the state of society in 2026 has these people this desperate, and in an arms race against reality itself (which they won't win), then I can't even begin to imagine what things will be like in the 2030s and 2040s, as things *really* start to break down. 

Get a grip, copers!  

Are we experiencing a crisis of conformity?

(The answer is yes.)

I was thinking a little bit about the state of the online world, including some places I used to frequent, and I think a lot of it goes to show that -- contrary to the confused conservative perspective -- Millennials and Zoomers (and especially Millennials!) are some of the most seethingly intolerant generations in world history.

When you look at their online groups (they literally do not leave the house), what you see is the exact opposite of the autistic / retarded notion that they're all far too accepting, their brains are too open, etc due to being spoonfed diversity propaganda in schools and in the workplace.

Basically, they can't tolerate anyone slightly different from them -- if male, they can't tolerate women (and vice versa). If on the right, they can't tolerate leftists. And the process goes on further and further from there: if they're part of the Thiel / Musk coom-slurper network, for example, they can't allow  anyone who is also right-wing but has more populist leanings.

Eventually you get a teeny-tiny echo-chamber of a bunch of people aggressively agreeing with each other (when they're not witch-hunting the few remaining people with independent opinions, who are not in 100% lockstep agreement, with one aggressive purity-test after another), which is both oppressively conformist and totally sterile.

It ties into the broader situation I discussed in some of my previous posts, comparing America with Japan, where if you look around you or compare with the past (or your parents' / other gens' experiences of it), you get the sense that people today are far more rigidly controlling, self-conscious, incapable of going with the flow, identical to each other, and generic than basically they have ever been, perhaps in human history. 

And this is why our society has become incapable of creative anything inspirational or interesting -- it's like a war against individuality, where the few who are still to some degree willing to be authentic and original get targeted by the seethingly mediocre echo-chamber-dwellers (again, just cuz they aggressively spout HR talking points does not mean they really agree with them, or that it translates into their behavior).

Millennial public temper tantrums

I know I promised not to keep the generational warfare going, but in this case it's just an accurate objective description rather than emotional rant. You may have noticed by now that a whole generation of 30s and 40 year olds is throwing public temper tantrums, and you're not allowed to criticize it or suggest that maybe the problem lies with them: fortunately I have this platform. This is purely Millennial hyper-competitiveness and entitlement, which they started and which nobody else before them (and hopefully after) ever did.

The way it works is that they're too coddled to have any real achievements to justify their inflated egos, and too sheltered to know how to relate to a crowd of random strangers who don't owe them anything or have a pre-existing relationship with them (like their indulgent helicopter parents). So instead of doing anything praise-worthy to win the approval of the audience, they drip venom about how 'I don't care what you think of me' (people who say this are always the *most* hyper-sensitive to what others think, not to mention anti-social). Then when this doesn't earn them a trophy, they stoop to demanding approval through threats of self-harm, hectoring, lecturing, preening, tantrums and rants, and so on and so forth.

'I'm not going to do anything to deserve it, but you'll still praise me anyway-- and if you don't, then get ready because the mother of all meltdowns is coming' is the intended message. It's just such anti-social psycho behavior.

Obviously, as I said before, this type of stuff did NOT exist before them among adults. No Boomer or Gen-Xer would have behaved like this, and if this kind of stuff had happened even 20 years ago, it would've been as so shameful that the screeching meltdown-thrower would have had to kill themselves out of sheer embarrassment -- imagine being an 11 yr old child, in the body of an adult, lol. 

However thanks to the MASSIVE overproduction of power-trippers, this behavior is now tolerated and frequent, rather than ostracized and rare. 

Aside from lowering the standards of adult behavior to make way for the Power-Tripper Generation, this is also the inevitable result of locking an entire cohort (now two cohorts) of young people inside the house, and never to allowing them to go outside or socialize freely or spend time in environments which do not have explicitly articulated / rigidly enforced rules. Their brains simply never learn how to socialize with strangers. Then they confuse what works with their parents (whining and meltdowns) with what works with other people (where these things just get you dismissed). Naturally this results in a very painful clash with reality.

When you are allowed to go outside and play with friends, you learn very quickly that acting like a freak means nobody will ever interact with you, and just gets you ostracized -- so you try to contribute something, rather than demand others adjust to you. It's most children should learn by the age of 7. But since these people were never allowed to learn such simple rules, the lessons are new to them (in their 30s and 40s), when it's far too late to change. 

Parents -- let your kids go outside!

The dumbest platform

Twitter is basically a gold mine of retardation, and you can literally collect endless cases of just how insane, wrong, and retarded they are about everything. There are more examples I could give, but I want to list some of the most obvious ones, because as far as I know nobody else has done. Also, because it'll help counter-act their insane view of themselves as occupying prime digital real estate or whatever. 

They have a major habit of writing dismissive / smug / cynical sounding posts, where they basically attempt to make some normal behavior come across as beneath them, inferior, irrational etc... only for you to realize that the writer has no clue WTF is going on. Sometimes they get the behavior they're describing precisely backwards. It's like reading a Martian attempting to pierce together human social norms.

They'll come up with convoluted explanations for things that have very simple causes, while thinking that the more complexity they add, the more accurate the final conclusion becomes -- just the opposite, lol. It becomes worthless.

They'll write completely fabricated / totally wrong BS / fan fic in a tone of such smug superiority that it makes it sound as if God Himself had told them personally. Or as if their view were so true that it didn't even require evidence or reasoning to justify (often the mistakes are high school level). This seems to be the result of grade-inflated college degrees. 

They'll attribute some grand long-term cause (like Evolution, Darwin, Female Nature, etc) to things that only started ten or maybe fifteen years ago at the latest. Sometimes they'll even go further and claim that some behavior that is obviously not fitness-enhancing or is maybe even totally destructive is UM AKSHUALLY fitness-enhancing, complete with some retarded made-up vignette of hunter-gatherer life.

They'll problematize and pathologize all kinds of things that are totally normal and natural and helpful, while turning a blind eye or even being in favor of things that are wicked and obviously sick. Sometimes they seem to be judging healthy behavior by the standards of sickness / mental-illness. 

In many cases the discrepancy between their own self-descriptions and the reality is so severe and jarring that you can only really understand what they're saying by flipping the meaning of the words around -- it's like they're so wrong that they almost get it right (almost). Then anyone who points this out has to deal with the inevitable temper tantrum (from some thin-skinned dork who can't handle reality, lol). 

They all seem to think that they belong to a highly exclusive club which the rest of us jealous inferiors are too low status, unintelligent, poor, and so on, to join -- they don't realize the whole world is laughing at them, and nobody takes their lame fan-fic seriously. 

Small update

With a somewhat obligatory reference at the outset.

No, don't be scared, I'm not planning anything crazy. I'm talking about getting in shape mentally. I also want to clean this place up, so that I can eventually show it to my friends and family. And I want to make it more accessible to normies, less infuriating, etc.

In that spirit, I'd like to announce that my previous post was the last one I'll ever write about Millennials. By now the basic patterns are well-established, and are hopefully becoming clear to most people: ego inflation, delusions of grandeur, temper tantrums, blaming Zoomers for the things *they* started, shut-in syndrome / autism / mid-life crisis due to never going outside, witch-hunts, and so on and so forth.

Most of the things you see on social media are variations on those patterns, and it's not as interesting to document the 1134th time they occur, compared to pointing it out the first time. So unless something new comes up that is worth addressing specifically, that content will take a back seat. If you're curious, you can go back and find the posts. 

Plus I'd also like to bury the hatchet, move on with life (hopefully to more interesting things), and that's impossible when you're in warfare mode all the time. And it puts other people on guard, too. So that's it.

As for the new directions and stuff, I'm weary of announcing anything specifically, but other the next few years I plan on studying more math, since that's the area where I'm (relatively) weak. Specifically, differential equations, but all kinds of other stuff too, depending on what piques my interest. Now that I'm in my 20s, I want to take advantage and learn difficult stuff, rather than wait for later, since it would be a lot harder then. So the volume of posts may decrease.

All for now. 

The Millennial midlife crisis

Some people have asked me why I sound so old -- it's not really an affectation (for example, I don't wear a bowtie or LARP as a Victorian gentleman or whatever lol), it's just that I was never into a single trend from the 2010s, because I thought they were all awful and cringe, and was always hostile to them.

It's hard to name all of them, but I've already posted about them, so you have some idea what I'm referring to. 

The point is that, back then, if you weren't seething enough, or overtly weird enough, or emo enough, you were actually slandered by the freaks -- it put a target on your back. So I did get some flak during the 2010s for those reasons (however I'm a very stubborn person and attempts at power-tripping only make me even more defiant and insane). 

Now after all that noise and all that talk about 'get with the times, BOOMER' -- the shoe is on the other foot, and they are the ones who are out-of-touch, lame and repulsive to actual young people, and increasingly needing to whine and blame Zoomers for everything (lol), as their oldness becomes more and more palpable. 

"Going outside? Talking to people? SOCIALIZING WITH NORMIEZZZ? Back in my day, young people were sexless shut-ins who spent their time binge-watching gore compilations on Liveleak! I can't believe you! Delete that post!" 

"You mean you *don't* fantasize about harming other people? Back in my day, hip and cool young people all had a favorite school shooter!"

"You think being weird is BAD????!!! Back in 2017, if you didn't eat garbage..."

And so on and so forth. 

All of this hysteria because they can't accept that 20 year olds in the 2020s don't think of them as cool, and that their influence is waning (the only people I see sucking up to Millennials are the older Zoomers born in the 90s) -- and if you think the situation is bad now, just wait for Gen Alpha.  

In fact, the best thing you can do for yourself as a young person (and for your 'generational brand') is to deliberately disavow whatever trends they're into, and follow the EXACT OPPOSITE of their advice across the board, lol. You'll feel a lot happier!

Like expressing yourself sincerely and not being afraid of being yourself (rather than performative grandiose LARPing / self-hatred and seething rage disguised as irony-poisoning), refusing to eat or indulge in various forms of garbage / weirdness, getting along with other people and especially women rather than picking pointless arguments for the sake of antagonism, growing up and moving on and making peace with the world rather than stewing in revenge fantasies like an 11 yr old child, not behaving like a tribalistic fuckin' zealot over things that are irrelevant, complimenting and being friendly rather than withholding praise and power-tripping, and so on and so forth. 

Get with *these times*, lol, rather than staying stuck in the awful 2010s forever!

A redpill that even the HBD nerds won't feed you

Here's another super-offensive post, which would get me banned on both sides, and especially among the Darwinoid elite-slurping alt-right.  

I want to say that I'm not personally a Jewish Question obsessive (like most non-mentally-broken people), and that I've known some who were very smart and cool, but I also don't regard them as being the master race, and it's worth writing the post just to counter-signal the servile HBD nerds who obsequiously worship higher IQ groups.

I find it annoying how they love to enumerate the multiple ways in which blacks and other non-white groups are inferior, but at the same time they get irrationally angry when you point out that the groups we're told to worship (especially Jews) have their own problems which we do not, or at least not to the same extent.

Since a lot of this slop is directly funded by Peter Thiel, I get the sense that for every potential Einstein they wow you with, there's really a billion Israeli scammers they are waving in to Silicon Valley -- the high IQ slop is to intimidate you by making you feel inferior, so you never point out what's going. However that's politics, and I want to talk about broader things.

To start off with, it's interesting to look at how much of Jewish art and culture revolves around being a neurotic, weird, misunderstood misfit whose anxious obsessions prevent him from enjoying the basic aspects of everyday life that most people can 'get' unconsciously, without dissecting them -- like dating, flirting, humor, small talk, dancing, and so on. Woody Allen, Philip Roth (off the top of my head -- but there are others).

Their creepiness / sex pest behavior / and weirdness around women is also well documented, and seems to be a result of their lack of physicality -- if you think back to high school, it was always the pale awkward uncoordinated misfit types who'd repulse girls the most, whereas jocks did not (just the opposite, actually).  

While Gentile societies also produce people with those problems, such as the pitiful cast of a Dostoevsky novel or Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver or the average nerd, they're nowhere near as big of a fraction of our population as they are among Jews.

I've also heard that they have lower scores on agreeableness and conscientiousness, compared to Gentiles, as well as of course being far more neurotic -- apparently this accounts for their overrepresentation in the hard sciences, too (and not just their higher IQ scores). They have personalities are that are more likely to disregard the consensus, hold nothing sacred, blaze a new trail, etc. 

Unfortunately in our degenerate era, there is a dearth of thinkers who have a more social sciences approach (in the non-BS way), who could point that being more anti-social on average is not a good thing, actually, and especially not for collectively-- the net effect of a whole group of people being both more intelligent (and thus more elite), while also being more anti-social, could be much worse than whatever individual benefits the geniuses they produce give you. But unfortunately everyone in our corrupted world views following the rules, being normal, working hard, as bad things, so nobody can say something as basic and obvious.

Small differences in the mean can lead to huge differences in the tails of a distribution -- so the nerds tell us, when talking about IQ. But apply to personality traits: if their personalities are more anti-social on average, we'd expect Jews to be massively overrepresented when it comes to behaviors that are warped and 'out there' and that are purely parasitic, anti-social, offensive, etc. They will make up a much larger fraction of the 'totally fucked up' share of the population. 

For obvious reasons, there are no studies to this effect (should some angry nerd come demanding evidence), but I honestly think their endless history of scandals and expulsions more or less speaks for itself, in that regard -- it would be beyond the scope of this post to list all of them, but they seem way more likely to glibly sell things which others would regard as sacred in general, including selling off domestic industries, child trafficking as a special case (see the Epstein scandal), and other forms of parasitism (look at the porn industry). 

It's revealing that there are Gentile groups which are also smarter, educated, and higher income -- like WASPs, for example, or the average educated liberal white person, or Euro elites-- who not widely stereotyped as untrustworthy and 'gotta watch your back around them'. Perhaps somewhat out-of-touch and old-fashioned, maybe. This shows you that it's not just behavior that is due to them being more urbanite and thus liberal / WEIRD morality -- they're specifically less moral in general. 

Prominent right-wingers -- conservatives... or libertarians?

I was thinking about making a post on the subject of conservative vs libertarian politics, where the (dun dun dun) obvious conclusion was that most mainstream right-wingers were just deranged libertarians, rather than conservatives, preservers and upholders of America or Western Civ, or whatever. 

However making a Serious Post would require an extensive intro, waffling, teasing, perhaps never reaching the conclusion -- since I don't have the energy for that, I'll write it like I would a comment, and then post it here for greater visibility to infrequent visitors.

For those who are not familiar with the research, the main difference between libs and cons is the disgust response (cons being more sensitive to disgust, libs less so), followed by the fact that conservatives place greater emphasis on purity, taboo, and in-group loyalty, compared to liberals -- see the work done by Jonathan Haidt. 

It turns out that libertarians score even lower on disgust, compared to liberals. And they are numb to the other major moral themes, unlike liberals (who de-emphasize them, compared to conservatives). They are are the most blunted and callous, and the least sensitive to disgust. See here for the evidence / background.

Their moral attitude is also "relatively cerebral as opposed to emotional"-- keep in mind that this is distinct from smart / intellectual (which, on the whole, they are not). It's a kind of nerdy, disembodied, detached / non-visceral style of thinking, which is hostile to intuition / emotion.

Applying these concepts to the current political divide, I think this explains why I find so many right-wingers repulsive, and why they in turn are so enthusiastic about promoting various forms of deviance -- such as out / there bizarre substances, living in your own filth, hyping up incel serial killers and school shooters as if they were saints and heroes, pornography / fetishes, gore and snuff films and torture footage (especially when they target innocent people and/or children), revenge fantasies, and the rest of that warped slop. 

Being libertarians, rather than conservatives, they are totally indifferent to taboo violation (which triggers the disgust response -- something they are incapable of feeling).

Instead the only emotion they feel is outrage and anger. These could, presumably, take the form of justified righteous vengeance or moral indignation at the fucked up state of society -- being a kind of martyr for a higher cause. 

But in practice they never act like this, and probably would scoff at someone who did resonate with such themes: instead it's more like they're addicted to the rush of spite that comes from enforcing some abstract principle ('UM AKSHUALLY'). 

It's individualistic (rather than channeling higher forces), power-tripping (pointlessly over-correcting crimes that are irrelevant in the broader scheme of things), and over-zealous; moreover all this obsession on punishment actually undermines morality, since there is no longer any reason to obey the rules when they are just going to be used to punish you anyway. 

It's also anti-conservative in the sense that it reduces everything to the utilitarian activation of certain receptors in the brain -- constantly stewing in rage, and making the consumption of rage-baiting slop your primary activity, fixating on punishment -- which in turn results in this kind of warped always-on-the-verge-of-going-postal zealot type of personality (anti-natural).  

Their kneejerk response, when they're confronted about their behavior, is along the lines of 'you can't tell me what to do, mannnnn' -- this is because their asocial brains are incapable or hostile to group membership, so they cannot really resonate with moral norms and judgement in general, (which primarily revolve around placing restrictions on individual behavior). Instead, they conceive themselves as bold individual liberated consumers who can do whatever they want.

Of course the interesting irony is that the liberated individuals, who are defined by withdrawing into their own cocoons and consuming various flavors of copium in total isolation, are so devoid of a personality that they are impossible to distinguish from one another (lol). Then as the hedonism becomes the main activity, the primary emotion is actually seething rage, rather than pleasure or joy (which are strangely absent in self-indulgence). 

Finally I also think this framework explains why the dorkazoids are so triggered by minorities, which I always found puzzling -- I don't mean wanting a more homogeneous nation, winding down immigration, feeling alienated due to being surrounded by foreigners, all of which are perfectly compatible with moral conservatism. I mean the characteristic flavor of rage, and getting worked up about the subject, and impotently fantasizing about revenge (as we see with the ICE masturbators). 

It's because they're weak, physically stunted, cerebral nerds, who feel easily threatened by brown / black people, and then spend their lives coping with that impotence through revenge fantasies, lol.  

Notice that they don't mention feeling what most people actually feel when they're surrounded by people who belong to a different ethnic group, speak an entirely different language, follow different customs, etc -- alienation. Most foreign ethnic groups aren't violently hostile, and nor do they practice rituals that are so sick and out there that you'd want to confront them and clean up -- it's more like you don't resonate with them, and that their presence makes you feel isolated and surrounded by strangers. 

However for libertarians, the concept of belonging doesn't make sense (DOES NOT COMPUTE) which means it's also literally beyond them to feel a lack of belonging -- and so, once again, the only emotion they have left is impotent rage. 

It also ties into the one group which is strangely absent from their retarded fantasies-- the homeless. Being surrounded by mentally-ill ex-asylum patients, who are often decomposing or shooting up right on the sidewalk, is a massive threat to normality. It's one of those things that does actually strike most people as needing a campaign / crusade to clean things up (unlike people of a different ethnicity living next to you) -- but once again, normality is not a theme they care about, so they pay no mind or even support it being degraded.

I always wondered, 'what kind of social conservative is seething with rage at the entire concept of normality?!' -- I never understood how you could hate the social order, and uphold being a gay reject... while calling yourself right-wing. Now, however, it makes much more sense. 

For now these are the main examples, but I'll add more in the comments if / when I think of them.  

The state of the GOP

Millennial (and Zoomer?) right-wingers are now soyfacing about slavery, as long as it's accompanied by edgy memes from 2008.

 

OMG BRO!!!!! I get to whine about FEMOIDS on the INTER-WEBS!!! WOW!!

I heckin' LOVE being a GOOD SLAVE! 

IMPOVERISH ME HARDER, ELON!!!! 

Meanwhile the guy commenting is the spitting image of a degraded cuck, and the person who made the video has a noticeable gay lisp -- but you're only allowed to notice the details we want you to notice, lol.

The definition of a dickless loser is someone who gets worked up into a furious rage over minor or irrelevant insults... and then does absolutely nothing when confronted with a serious offense. 

Right-wingers will whine and whine about women, wage war over the tranny question, and crusade for LGBTQ-free video-games... but when Trump and Israel and the other billionaire lobbies are busy flushing them down the drain, they are either silent or in some cases active participants in their own replacement. Pathetic.

Watching this disaster unfold has led me to the following conclusions:

1) Conservatism may be impossible in a nation as young, rootless, and fragile as America. It's more like liberalism vs deranged libertarianism. 

2) The right-wing is mostly for people who are lame and out-of-touch with social trends. It has nothing to do with attitudes, stability, preservation, disgust / purity: it's just a movement you join if you weren't part of the cool kids in high school.  

3) Right-wingers are far less confrontational than left-wingers, both against their overlords and their political opponents. 

Leftists will use institutions, the media, protests, etc for offensive campaigns to wipe out their enemies, actively; right-wingers hide in their domestic bunkers and quibble about the meaning of words. They also infight more than the left.

Democrats criticized Biden and openly admitted that his administration was garbage (which it was). Right-wing audiences have built a cult around cringely worshiping Trump, who has become schizophrenic. 

Because they spend their time slurping up fan-fic, I largely ignore them, and instead get most of my news from populist / anti-woke left-wing media outlets instead. 

(Even an equivalent anti-woke / populist figure like Tucker Carlson is far more delusional and psychotic than his left-wing counterparts: his show is about magic, ghosts, spiritual influences, Tarot cards, and other kinds of ridiculousness. A journalist asks him a single question, and he doesn't know what planet he's on, which is why I don't listen to him anymore, despite liking him.)  

4) To the extent that one party is less likely to blow things up, and more hostile to scammers and parasites... that would be the Democrats.

All of this makes it a no-brainer for people like me with independent standards to vote for the left: the GOP is just an unreformable cancer that has to be eradicated in order to make way for something better. Trump and his cult have to be wiped out politically and perhaps also personally: if voting for the left is what secures that outcome then I'm fine with doing that.

Update to the update on Venezuela

The whole thing was 1000% fake. 

The Venezuelans are certainly not fighters, so they took a bunch of money in exchange for handing over their leader, and allowing the FAFO American military to stage a public operation -- when the dilapidated US military comes away with a win, you know there must have been something going on behind the scenes. 

However now the MAGAtards get to brag, 'Heh, no more regime change, no more bringing democracy to the 3rd world savages... now we just go in there and take what we want. Fuck around, find out... heh.'  

Well, despite this verbalistic slop being posted everywhere on social media, they still have no actual physical control over the oil or influence over the Venezuelan gov't -- they never have, and never will (they only do in the deranged minds of Trump cult members). 

And even if they did, it would take years to build up the infrastructure, assuming our shithole economy even has the people with the skills required for those tasks (doubtful). Not to mention that the amount of oil that is being sent here is so tiny, that it won't even put a dent in the upcoming Iran-war-related economic collapse. 

Such laughable BS!

The important thing to understand, and then remember, is that collapsing empires don't suddenly resuscitate, regain all their powers, and then go on to conquer new territory -- this literally has never happened, in all of history. They just die, and that is what America is doing now, with one defeat after another: in Iran, in Lebanon, in Venezuela, in Yemen, in Ukraine... and maybe soon in Taiwan, too, for good measure.

Remembering this will keep you from being scammed into thinking that there will be a W somewhere down the line -- there won't be. 

All that's left during the collapsing stage is concocting, and selling, fan fiction, in the hopes that the audience will be dumb or desperate enough to suspend disbelief, disconnect from reality, abandon all logic, etc and not notice just how ridiculously implausible the slop actually is, and how obviously it is contradicted by the actually-occurring events, which anyone whose brain isn't plugged in 24/7 to a digital hallucination machine can notice. 

The billionaires are betting on the audience members being in such desperate straits that they'll abandon all their dignity, just to get a little rush of copium. 

(And with the Trump Cult, it seems they were correct -- but you shouldn't stoop to that!)

Don't miss out on the chance to wipe out MAGA

I have seen other right-wingers I follow say the same thing, so I might as well jump on the bandwagon. The post almost writes itself.

The main thing I want to announce is that I plan on voting for the left in the upcoming midterms and the general, purely in order to wipe out as much MAGA / Republican scum as possible. They deserve it. 

(Yes, I know what the blog is called. From now on, 'right' must be interpreted as meaning 'correct' and 'truthful' rather than indicating my political preferences lol.) 

I struggle to imagine that anything in America will be better with the Dems in charge. However, Trump, the Republican Party, and their Internet slopagandists have worked hard enough that my desire to get revenge on them outweigh whatever reservations I might have about the left. 

I'll end the post by reviewing some facts about the major achievements of Trump's 2nd term:

-Not a single job has come back. The tariffs subsidize moving the already off-shored jobs out of CHYNA and to India and Malaysia and Vietnam (and wherever else they can find slave labor) by passing those costs onto the consumer in the form of higher prices. They are anti-industrial. 

-Trump has started and lost a retarded war against Iran for Israel, with big consequences for the world economy. He has managed to make America look militarily weak and morally disgusting, in a uniquely cringe way. 

-The Ukraine war has been allowed to continue, and now the neo-Nazi LARPers in Kyiv have been given permission to strike inside Russia. Not even Biden was willing to do this. This is another disaster with profound impoverishing effects on the world and on America. 

-Illegal immigration into America has not changed or gone down, because none of the billionaire lobbies that benefit from it have been targeted: I called this one back in 2024. It was obvious. Moreover, Trump has amplified people like Musk and Vivek, who are seethingly in favor of replacing Americans.

However Republicans have opened up a new genre of racebaiting fan fic, which does target immigrants, and that allows the rightoids to get high on revenge fantasies against the people who laughed at them for playing World of Warcraft back in high school -- getting replaced never felt so good! 

-The AI cancer has been deregulated further, to the detriment of the real / productive economy.

I'll admit I underestimated the degree to which the entire right-wing movement consisted of cucks who were only in it in order to escape reality (and their suicidal ideations) -- turns out they are the majority. Because they have no self-esteem, they will eagerly slurp up whatever they can get, even if the outcomes are the opposite of their purported goals. Trash-consumers, and trash producers. 

Anything I can do to wipe them out...

Life in Japan?

Just a non-political post to plug a cool channel, which may be of interest to the weebs out there, or to those who are simply interested in Japan like me. It's by an Australian man who lives there and is married to a Japanese woman, and who vlogs (?) about his experiences. 

 

This is the video that lured me in, originally.  

For future readers, in case it gets taken down or whatever: he's driving around at night, talking about how much easier it is to have fun in Japan than in Australia. In the former, people are encouraged to channel their energy in a way that leads to fun, collective effervescence, etc. While in the latter, the miserable angry power-trippers clamp down on every bit of individual expressiveness, until eventually everyone is lonely and atomized (for no reason!). 

It's interesting because our image of Japan is of an ultra-conformist hellhole where everyone is overworked, and yet every interaction I've had with them (or witnessed online) has made them seem way more FREE than we Americans / Westerners are these days. And I don't just mean in the narrow sense of being able to spontaneously shoot fireworks, but in the broader sense of being more unburdened, unrestrained, allowed to be who they really are... and without having to constantly monitor their communications, put on emotional armor, apologize for every micro-micro-expression, like we have to here.  

It goes back to what I was trying to say in my (poorly written) post about fighting for your authenticity, etc-- there's a real sense that if you try to be sincere, open, and unrestrained you'll be targeted by the seething ironic hater crowd, for not being enough of a faggot (an offense against the climate of maximum conformity, in their eyes). 

You also realize that phrasing everything in a non-offensive / watered down way, and being an ultra-offensive all the time, are in fact two sides of the same coin (inauthenticity, and specifically, not wanting to genuinely bond with other people). One is trying to avoid social connections by just not saying anything at all, by being as meek and inconspicuous as possible, etc, while the other is so dialed up and to the max that it is also impossible to relate to, which makes them seem different, but they both actually stem from a similar instinct.  

Anyways... check the channel out!

The grand finale

The other great aspect of all this is that they essentially managed to turn the entire audience against them, so the grand finale to America's Middle Eastern adventures will even more satisfying and enjoyable, because of how much anti-social slop they tried to shove down our throats during Season 1. 

I still remember how they were celebrating the pager attacks in Lebanon (which killed children), not to mention the dismissive irony-poisoned tone about the genocide in Palestine... and of course they even got to bomb that one school in Iran! 

When you work *that* hard to establish yourself as the serial killer type, it makes it all the more rewarding and enjoyable for us to watch you just get relentlessly bullied and (hopefully) wasted by the Persians. 

It's fundamentally no different from watching a giallo or some other crime thriller, where the protagonist is facing off against some deranged psycho. We're rooting FOR the innocent protagonist, not the serial killer. However autistic / retarded people can't understand this, apparently, or they're so seething with rage that they refuse to understand it, and so they proudly alienate the audience, while doubling down on that garbage.

Then when literally nobody supports them, or people just laugh at their failure, they start lecturing about how our brains are too small to appreciate the moral greatness of school shootings-- TAKE A HINT. You fucking morons. 

To make matters much worse for MAGAtards, Iran is not an unstable kleptocracy like Venezuela, or a smaller-sized nation with limited influence like Lebanon. Nor is it, for that matter, a gay collapsing empire like America (which is incapable of winning on the battlefield). 

The Persians actually know how to build and use advanced weapons, unlike their American counterparts (who spent 30 years preparing for this war, but didn't realize you should build bases underground when your enemy has missiles). And they are smart enough to use them for military and political purposes, rather than dumb school shooter crusades that go nowhere. And all without going bankrupt!

So they are now taking over a major trade route, wiping out their rivals (economically and militarily), and of course earning regional prestige and credibility by taking a stand against the Epstein Empire. Awesome! 

And we don't have to hear endless sermons about genetic superiority and Social Darwinism, from a bunch of whiny losers who probably never even studied biology. Lessons for autistic morons, for the improvement of future fan-fiction: winning actions speak for themselves. You don't have to talk about winning, when you're actually winning! 

Get bullied! 

Update on Iran

Let's address the major predictions first and foremost:

-There has been ZERO gov't, ethnic, political, or social fragmentation in Iran. No pro-CIA youth uprising, like they were hoping would take place. 

In fact, to the extent that there were internal schisms, they reflected the opposite process-- the takeover of the government by the hardline military / IRGC, who demoted the previous rulers (clerics / diplomats / scholars), while attacking America in the region even harder than before. 

And so they just wiped out one base after another, turning the globohomo crusader LARPers into fine red mist, while forcing the Gulf jihadist nations to just sit there and take it like bitches. And all while the Orange Retard wailed impotently on social media!  

I guess regime change assassinations really do work. 

-It goes without saying, but America is getting wrecked, and will lose here just like it has lost every single other war, going back to WW2. There's nothing shocking there: the outcome is not in doubt, at least not by anyone with a brain. 

The funny / amusing thing, though, has been the fact that the bullying from Iran has gotten so bad, that the various right-wing slop outlets and propagandists have literally *dropped* it entirely from their various livestreams, tweets, blog posts, etc. As in, they will not even address it, and refuse to mention it, due to how painful it is for them. 

Ironically enough, these guys used to say, 'words can't change reality' and 'facts don't care about your feelings'.  

But now they've been forced to collectively plunged their heads in the sand, and just completely tune out reality itself-- and so they are forced to memory-hole and downplay the biggest (and really, the most disastrous) foreign war of all time, even as it unfolds in-front of the whole world, simply because it is too painful for them and their copes. 

I guess this is how high school must have felt like, for these seething emo school shooter losers (LOL)! 

Get bullied! 

[UPDATE: 

A further irony is that every time Social Darwinism gets implemented in politics, it always leads to extinction and collective failure, rather than amazing triumphs, out-competing your rivals, etc.

Peter Turchin in War and Peace and War talks about how Machiavelli was a failure in politics, despite his ultra-cynical theories. The Nazis-- easily the most tiresome example-- were into the exact same evolutionary rhetoric and racial fanfic that today's right-wingers are... and lost pathetically, on both fronts. 

Not to mention the legions of school shooters who invoke Darwin, alpha / beta males, bla bla bla in their manifestos... while committing suicide for no higher purpose.  

So in that sense, I guess it's not that surprising to see today's right-wingers also committing collective suicide, blowing up the foundations of American / Western prosperity, while at the same time bragging about their heritage (which they are demolishing), the survival of the fittest (as they go right off the cliff), the triumph of IQ over barbaric Muzzie ignorance (though they can't handle reality without a series of pathetic coping mechanisms), and so on and so forth...]

Normie-maxxing; more false promises

Just a brief little post on what I've been doing lately, and some thoughts.

The main change in my life has been that I've been going a lot more, and socializing more, and that's caused me to reflect on the nature of my online existence-- like most Zoomers, and really probably most adults these days, this is my primary form of social connection (as sad as that sounds).

Putting myself out there has made the online activities come across as less and less compelling and motivating-- online platforms are basically totally dominated by non-normies, which means specifically a kind of broken / mentally-ill type, in some cases a literal school shooter freak. These people are so deprived and anti-social that they only exist for the rush of spite that they get from antagonistic interactions: it provides them enough motivation not to kill themselves.

This has resulted in the kind of junkie-slop online media economy we have now, where everything is made in order to spike the addicts' increasingly hardened receptors, which are recalcitrant to activation-- notice how every subject covered (Palestine, Epstein, grooming gangs) winds up turning into a snuff film, where multiple different voyeuristic fetishes are mixed together for the online degenerates to snort up. 

You can understand how this is demotivating to read or respond to.

It's also very refreshing to note that normal IRL people are the opposite of spiteful, vindictive, and warped-- not that there aren't assholes here or there, but the behavior is more open and cool compared to online-only interactions. I

 think something about the nature of the Internet allows for a much more prolonged sense of hostility (I guess because there is no catharsis like there is for IRL confrontations). At this point I think that you should never communicate online with people you don't already know, and trust IRL.

The other interesting thing, which hasn't even been noticed in the discourse, is the massive shift in girls' behavior. Maybe this is more pronounced among Zoomers, and Millennials (who dominate Twitter) just don't notice it-- but basically, there has been a massive rebellion against birth control, meds, and other mood stabilizers over the past few years.

These days, and especially if you're handsome + well-dressed, your odds of being noticed and even approached by a girl are WAY HIGHER than they would have been 5-10 years ago. In fact, it's crazy how eager they are to interact with guys, talk to them, flirt, etc. It just doesn't take place in a transactional, mediated, or super-sexual way (as if you were sending them pics through some gay app), but the interest is there.

So I guess the goal going forward will be to write posts that a normal, functional, healthy, stable, non-institutionalized adult could appreciate. In terms of the false promises I have become famous for giving, one plan / idea is to start writing book reviews, inspired by this guy (ignore the GOPslop he gets paid to write, he covers some interesting / niche books). Obviously I won't be giving my formal assessment of them LOL, but I mean it in the sense of tangents / ideas which might inspire further discussion or strike readers as interesting. We'll see!

Poor form and scientific modeling

I was trying to think of an analogy for a problem that has become very widespread these days. 

The basic idea is that when you play a sport at an amateur level, you can get away with a lot of mistakes / sloppiness, and win by athleticism alone. But as you scale it up, and reach higher levels of difficulty, these same mistakes will cripple you and prevent you from advancing: you'll lose to people who may be less talented, but know how to do things properly.

And if you go on for too long that way, you'll be in a situation where you'll have to choose between being stuck at whatever point you max out at, and never progressing in the future, or being forced to go back to fundamentals and relearn everything from scratch, a very expensive and time-consuming process. 

The reason why a good instructor is so harsh on these things isn't because they're mean or out to get you specifically (at least, not in most cases) but because weeding these mistakes out early saves a ton of time later, and at a small cost, compared to allowing them to fester.

The same is true for language acquisition, and really most types of learning in general.

Ironically enough, this can mean that sometimes the worst players at higher levels are the most gifted or talented ones, at the amateur level-- their raw talent allows them to avoid getting punished for mistakes, which means they never bother learning, and this in turn cripples them when they move up to a new level of difficulty where these trivial things actually do matter. (See the whole gifted student -> pizza deliverer pipeline for proof in another subject.)

The way that I see it being relevant for science is that often people with high IQs but no actual knowledge can experience a ton of success in life, without bothering to formally study anything. Unfortunately they then assume that the same combination of 'intuition + raw intelligence' will help them in building mental models or solving problems at much higher levels. But they are actually crippled by naive assumptions and sloppy habits which-- due to their lack of experience-- they cannot even detect (though a trained professional could), and so they are doomed to spend their time crashing into predictable walls, and getting stuck there forever. 

Look at the ongoing and probably never-ending inflationary meltdown, or the AI bubble-- ultra-expensive models are constructed by pseudo-experts who congratulate themselves for their visionary genius, only to fail in the most basic and predictable ways. 

More music I enjoy

I wanted to post some of the music I've been listening to lately, in order to lower the pretentiousness of the blog-- not everything has to be political, or deranged, or whatever.

'You're being a Boomer / normie bro,' -> probably the reaction I'd get on just about every social media platform. (God forbid someone not be into garbage.)

I said this in a somewhat emo in a way in a previous post, but the bitter haters that make up most of the society / the Internet will try to cancel you, shame you, and laugh at you for anything, regardless of what you may or may not have done-- anything to score a W at someone's expense. And really, because of how warped today's society is, they'll target you harder for your good deeds, compared to deviant or evil behavior (which they overlook, or even encourage!). 

That's why I don't really mind being myself at this point, however against-the-grain not being into gay slop is-- why bother faking it? If you're going to be punished regardless, you might as stand up for yourself, and be honest about your personality.

AI, negative applications?

(I'm trying to go with a different approach, where I structure / edit / polish my posts less going forward. I think there's a certain point where being perfectionistic just restricts your output, while making you sound pretentious.)

I haven't talked much about AI, since I don't find it very interesting or useful, but a thought that has been in the back of my head is that to the extent that it is useful, it's more of a question of "negative" rather than "positive" applications.

Fundamentally, and despite trillions of dollars being thrown at it, it cannot create great art, introduce new scientific paradigms, or even really come up with interesting or insightful comments during a conversation (AI's speech sounds like a cross between an HR person and a used car salesman). It thus has no real positive contributions to make-- but I think can be used as a tool to reveal fakeness within the economy, as well as the broader society. 

Namely if a certain sector is vulnerable to what amounts to an industrial-scale Slop Machine, it means there wasn't much real work being done in the first place. AI can be used as a detector, to test for and reveal the presence of bullshit and fake work: if it successfully replaces human labor in this or that area, it's because the humans were not doing much in the first place.

So the fact that AI is having extraordinary success within academia should not be taken as a sign of its genius, but rather as an indication of the deep structural flaws and decline of academic culture. The fact that they are incapable of distinguishing between hallucinated meaningless gibberish and real honest / insightful work, reveals how low standards have fallen.

In that sense, AI is like a species, and academia is the environment. Its exponential growth within the niche reveals that the environment positively selects for garbage, which it can produce at a much faster rate than any human can (notwithstanding the valiant efforts of academics in recent decades). 

I say the same thing for everyday tasks: anything that you're doing which AI can do better, is not worth doing in the first place. Whatever it is can probably be consigned to meaningless / filler work, and cut out of your routine. 

So for example, I've heard that AI is great at writing emails-- what we can infer is that, obviously, most emails are a waste of time, and ultimately meaningless, and so perfectly suited for a machine that can only generate meaningless slop. 

Other insightful people have already noticed this, and it seems to be a general theme: instead of heading to a techno-dystopia, where the all-powerful machines subjugate humanity, what we're really headed for is a kind of absurdist Philip K Dick scenario, where the laughably incompetent machines break all kinds of things, and we all have to act like babysitters cleaning up after an immature, reckless, ADHD child. 

 

Tulsi Gabbard finally quits; more reflections on MAGA filth

Just a brief comment today, now that Tulsi Gabbard is finally out-- something she should've done sooner, in order to avoid contaminating herself and her political brand with the stench of Trump's horrendous neocon admin.

There is nothing surprising about this event, since it was 100% guaranteed from the outset that she would be ousted. No way an anti-establishment / pro-Iran figure would be tolerated for long, even if she was relatively muted and checked out and non-confrontational wrt to Trump's agendas. 

It was always very revealing to witness the level of seething disdain and hatred she brought out of the MAGAtards-- one of the few figures who could do that, and one that they never bothered to hype up or praise or include in their literally fake & gay social media circlejerks (unlike Vance, Cruz, Rubio, etc). 

An attractive, well-adjusted, confident, woman-- too much of a painful reminder of the endless normie women who rejected and ignored MAGAtards all throughout high school and college, which is why they hated her guts so badly. 

And too much of a relatable aloha all-American vibe in her persona, feelings which are totally incompatible with the seething hatred that defines this movement-- composed of foreign-born scammers / parasites and native-born social rejects-- whose sole goal is to sink America for good, as part of one final anti-social revenge fantasy against the normies who've always looked down in disgust at them.

Iran rant

Nothing new to say, just reposting some stuff I wrote previously but didn't upload: 

Trump has now reached Biden levels of senility-- he gets up in the morning and says one thing, and then in the evening he says the exact opposite, and his (equally brain-dead) supporters are then tasked with concocting 5D chess / 190 IQ explanations for why insanity is akshually genius, if you think about it carefully. The same is true of the broader war. It's just beyond pathetic, and hard to think of a sadder group.

America is of course an empire in severe decline, and everything that's going on must be understood in those terms-- it's not the Midcentury, when the elites could carefully implement their plans in ways that went undetected by the unaware / distracted normies. Rather, it's a case of the retarded leading the insane, so everyone in the broader society realizes that these plans (AI, green energy, another war in the M-E) are just totally doomed to fail disastrously, and so the propagandists are deluding themselves rather than fooling anyone else, and they enjoy no real influence or support outside of a handful of teeny echo-chambers (which are only becoming more and more irrelevant to the rest of society as time goes on, no different from the mainstream media).

'If you don't want endless inflation, just so America can lose another war in the M-E-- well you're just a CUCK and 3rd worldist!'

'It's called survival of the fittest, kid-- we lose, and other people win, and the harder we lose the better!'

Sure thing Boomer, whatever you say Boomer.

And as usual with losers, the MAGtards do nothing except whine and cry about the state of the world, and how cruel it is to them-- literally identical to the noises ANTIFA made after getting Rittenhouse'd-- now that their delusions of grandeur have been collided with the IRGC's missiles. Apparently Iran was supposed to 'just take a beating' or fight back 'in appropriate ways', rather than retaliate in a way that would allow them to win. And on top of that their missiles and drones 'crossed international lines!' and even hurt the innocent American soldiers!

Again, you'll basically never see a group of people spend more time sniveling about how cruel the world is to them than these so-called alpha males, Darwinian superiors, autistic ubermenschen... almost as if this is what happens when you spend your entire life constructing a narcissistic persona, because you're unable to cope with being a generic reject loser.

So many retarded faggots, and in so many powerful positions... it's hard to think of a nation more crawling with AIDS than America in the 21st century. 

Psychedelics, revisited

I thought I'd summarize and condense all of my thoughts in one post, to make it easier for people to find them. It's not that original, but it's more for anyone who finds the discourse surrounding these drugs very suspicious (a sign your BS-detector is working correctly)-- it's a look at the basic facts and arguments, which you can also use to push back at all the pretentious slop they're trying to inundate social media with.

Getting through to the drug addicts themselves is impossible, because they are members of a massive cult where all they do is jerk themselves off to fantastic tales of wonderful benefits and amazing superpowers and whatnot-- criticizing their preferred flavor of copium threatens to take way their crutch, so they will lash out in fury. But at least you can be aware of how scant the evidence is, and how dubious the reasoning is, and spread that knowledge to others.

1) The proper scientific name for all these substances is 'hallucinogen'-- 'psychedelic' is a literal sci-fi term, invented by the sci-fi writer Aldous Huxley. The former is a more accurate label because it tells you right away what the drugs do (they give you delusions, and make you hallucinate) whereas the latter doesn't and in fact misleads as to their nature. 

2) Hallucinogens causes psychosis, especially in people who have a mental-illness or are at risk for one. This is common knowledge. There is also a link to schizophrenia, which is not as simple as stating that they cause it (they may simply bring it out prematurely in those who are genetically predisposed; people with weird brains are also more likely to self-medicate with drugs to cope with their problems), but is there nonetheless. The point is that it's simply not true that they are 'risk free' and 'not harmful'. 

3) It is possible to get addicted to them. While hallucinogens themselves don't cause tolerance or withdrawal, people with addictive brains (like drug addicts) can still go through the process of addiction anyways. 

It's important to note that in many cases where people repeatedly announce that X or Y 'isn't addictive' they are usually not making a claim about reality or a rational argument or whatever, but are really in the process of beginning the cycle of addiction, and are simply trying to reduce cognitive dissonance by rationalizing their behavior.

You'll notice that this is especially common among users of hallucinogens (not surprising, given that the drugs make you delusional). They will often make verbal claims that are directly at odds with their real-world, observable behavior: they will tell you that the drugs are not addictive, as they withdraw from social relationships in the pursuit of greater and greater highs, or that they're not harmful, as they become more mentally unstable, or that they are not gateway drugs, while getting addicted to all kinds of other drugs. This discrepancy between their self-image and behavior just never occurs to them. 

4) Many of the terms confidently used by the hallucinogen enthusiasts don't mean anything, or describe processes that are poorly understood or unclear. In some cases they even imply things that go against basic scientific knowledge. 

The confidence with which they use the terms is unwarranted, given how limited the research is, but it is is fairly common among pseudoscientific fads: poorly-understood terms are used to impress laymen and silence their doubts by creating the illusion of total confidence, while the gatekeepers and gurus preen about their special esoteric knowledge (which often turns out to be fabricated).  

For example, many of them tout the birth of new neurons ('neurogenesis') that occurs during the drug trip, as if they were sprouting a second brain or enlarging their minds or discovering new things or whatever, when the reality is that this process-- the hippocampus birthing new neurons--  occurs in adulthood as a response to brain damage, such as following traumatic brain injury or a stroke. (This is not to mention that hallucinations themselves are almost always seen as signs of brain damage.)

Of course this is not definitive either, but the point is that the advocates are using poorly-researched terms to justify extraordinary claims, which they also usually present glibly (as if they were well-established facts), when they should require mountains of evidence to prove. 

5) Nobody who uses these drugs in the long run comes across as remotely sane, normal, or well-adjusted-- the exact opposite. They suffer from delusions of grandeur and main character syndrome (perhaps due to damaging the parts of their brain responsible for emotional regulation), and to the extent that they can distinguish between reality and their own private narcissistic fantasies, they seem to look down on reality A brief look at their state is a better argument than anything I could come up with.

6) Finally, regular users of hallucinogens are in denial as to who they actually are-- junkies.

This arguably the most damaging aspect of the whole cope, which is that it obscures the nature of what they are doing by presenting their retreat from reality, descent into addiction, and decision to self-medicate with poorly-understood substances as a heroic win, a triumph, a form of exploration, etc when fundamentally none of this is true.

At this point many of them will try to defend their lifestyles by pointing out the many well-known and obvious flaws of Big Pharma and the failures of SSRIs, but in many ways their decisions represent an intensification of the already-dangerous tendencies of the status quo-- they reject the traditional drugs, in favor of even harder versions of them (rather than trying to live a healthy or natural lifestyle) and they replace a flawed process with one that is guaranteed to fail (self-medicating). All in all the whole thing is a very harmful and disturbing trend.  

Japanese vs American Twitter

One of the cooler trends on Twitter recently has been the whole Japanese x American cultural exchange, which I've found very revealing in terms of the main differences between the two cultures.

The Japanese mainly seem to use Twitter to discuss culture, food, art, share anecdotes and stories, get nostalgic, and keep up with the other 95% of totally normal interests that are never mentioned on American Twitter-- and if they were to be mentioned, it would be with scornful disdain, as if those things were inferior activities (cuz people who regularly fry their brains with digital opium are too joyless to derive any pleasure from daily life).

I also saw very little political content-- and even the stuff I saw wasn't extreme, deranged, weird, deliberately gatekept, etc, it was all just reasonable stuff anyone could agree with. Not meant to be offensive or triggering. 

This more normal focus ties into another trend I noticed, which was the total lack of irony, the widespread sincere tone, and the eagerness to please and interact in a friendly way with the other side on their behalf. It was very refreshing, and at the same time could not be more opposite of  how things are done in America.

The way it works here is that everyone just hides their feelings all the time, through a kind of ironic numbness, and so most people never really express anything.  The actually sincere people-- the ones who are willing to open up, show their feelings, and make an effort-- are a tiny minority of the population, including on the Internet, and to make things worse are always on the defensive, because there's a kind of seething bitter hater type (and general impulse in the culture) to tone-police any display of emotion, in order to maintain peak irony and hostility. 

This results in a situation where the best you can hope for on most forums, websites, sub-cultures, etc is just an environment of atomized neutrality, where people refrain from witch-hunting and cancelling each other, but otherwise don't form real connections (since doing so would violate the rule against showing any emotion)-- and at worst, as everyone knows, seething hatred, pile-ons, neverending witch-hunts, etc. 

I know that it's a very downer thing to say, and I don't mean to shit on American / Western culture so much in the midst of something positive like this, but it really does make me bitter about how sterile, anti-social, and hostile our culture has become.

My own website / moving

I have my *own* site now! 

Well, not really, it's just Wordpress-- but it's better than leeching off of Google, and it allows me to customize the appearance and whatnot more easily too. 

https://rightpopulist.blog

(Yes, I realize this is not the most creative name, but I wanted there to be continuity between one site and the other.) 

As for the content itself, what that'll be like, I don't want to give away too much-- for now, just envision a torrent of misinformation, flowing straight from the mouth of Putin himself, like a river of lava from a volcano, and that'll give you a rough idea. 

Racism, cynicism, misanthropy, bitterness... it'll all be there, and your puny soul will only be capable of trembling at the sight. We're talking about a very hardcore and serious type of unpaid online journalism, not your father's idea of blogging at all. 

(In all seriousness, I promise it won't be that bad, please click and don't be afraid.)

New war alert!

Despite already having ranted on the subject at length, I find it hard to ignore the upcoming war with Iran.

Every single war in the M-E has failed, going back decades now, and most recently in Yemen and Afghanistan-- so we don't need to speculate about the potential outcome of this one, and anyone doing so is simply retarded: it will fail too, just like all the other ones, with the only real question being how. 

Anyone ignoring this obvious fact, is just a paid propagandist trying to rebrand the status quo as based, edgy, shocking, new, etc-- nowadays, probably some Millennial faggot on Twitter, as opposed to some equally retarded Boomer on Fox News, but still the same old same old. 

I think it helps to categorize the different outcomes of previous conflicts using Nassim Taleb's terms: either the affected nation collapses under the immense stress and never recovers ('fragile') or the continuous intervention manages to create a force that winds up wiping out the invaders ('anti-fragile').

The examples of fragility are Libya, Syria, and Iraq-- the ruling regime and the institutions are destroyed, but without replacing them with a pro-American version, and so the entire nation just plunges into pure anarchy and chaos, without us gaining control over resources, territory, population, etc, just a sheer waste of lives for no benefit.

Given how weak and old the regime in Iran is, with the protests and general senility and so on, this is certainly a possibility.

The other set of outcomes are less discussed by the media, or even by anti-war Americans, because they're humiliating to think about-- but it's a textbook case of what happens when you continuously and naively intervene: you wind up in incentivizing the creation of an even more hostile force. 

This is what has taken place in Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Yemen-- it's not that the invasion failed, but they actually became stronger, and wound up going on the offensive. Anti-fragile growth.

The Taliban withstood the US Army, and then kicked them out and took control over the entirety of Afghanistan. Lebanon withstood the Israeli invasion, kicked them out in the 2000s, resisted another invasion in 2006, and has now forced them out of Northern Israel. The Houthis resisted a decade of bombing from the Pentagon, won their civil war, and now control the Red Sea.

It goes beyond mere defeat-- an even worse loss than if you had not gotten involved.

I don't rule out this process taking place in Iran either, and perhaps especially if the ruling regime is assassinated / destroyed-- neocon retards are barely able to think two steps ahead, or account for the effect of their own actions.

In any case, those are the examples to keep in mind. (And again, anyone thinking we're going to see amazing benefits -- retarded, and probably a puppet.)

I've also discussed this before, but here in America we seem to have entered into the Era of the School Shooter in the 2020s-- we've gone from having more and more corrupt elites, but hiding it somewhat, to now having openly anti-social, unhinged, freaks who hate the people they're in charge of. 

It's not an exaggeration to say that they resemble some psychotic loser blowing up his school more than anyone with a trace of sanity, and in fact they'll probably be remembered in those terms: they simply no longer bother hiding the contempt they feel for the people under them. 

In this particular case, with the military, I imagine they've realized how unpopular their agenda is with the post-Boomer generations, and especially with Millennials and Zoomers (regardless of how much they spend on marketing, branding, paying off Millennials on Twitter, etc).

They also know that America is headed for some kind of severe financial crisis.

This means that the days of occupying the world, or propping up Israel, or fighting pointless wars in the M-E will be drawing to a close soon-- and I think they've figured that out, and are waging one final unhinged campaign against their enemies, a kind of all-out assault before they bite the dust for good.

This is not limited to the military (just the most dramatic example)-- you see the same behavior throughout most institutions, such as the COVID response, the DNC rigging elections and forcing Biden / Kamala onto their own voters, politicians like Vivek and Musk openly telling Americans to embrace being replaced with cheap labor, and so on and so forth.

Power-tripping on steroids, pointless campaigns that achieve nothing, doubling down on a losing hand, and committing suicide for no real reason-- that's the new era we live in, and that's why I don't waste my time trying to find a logical high-IQ motive to explain or justify this behavior, since it doesn't exist.

Yes, nerds, autists, and geeks aren't even close to being smart

Now that I have my own safe space, I can finally admit to one of my most non-PC beliefs, which would get me banned on every Internet forum, sub-culture, etc (since they control them).

As I said before about Internet People, just as many of them are misfits, the majority of them are also nerds, in fact probably around 95%. The two syndromes overlap.

Unfortunately the nerds have rewritten the entirety of human history (also with some help from Hollywood) to make it sound as if they are the true geniuses, the real gifted ones, the mavericks, bla bla bla, unjustly punished by mediocre society, etc etc etc. 

The truth is that, despite this grandiose narrative, you will never find a nerd, autist, or geek (on any Internet sub-culture) with amazing discoveries in math or science or engineering, profound knowledge of art or literature or linguistics, capable of writing symphonies or painting masterpieces, or really doing anything remotely respectable or cool-- and this is because nerds are dumb, unoriginal, mediocre, slop-consuming weirdos.

The nerds do brag about certain things, in fact all they do is brag about how unique and special they are, but many of their achievements are either incredibly common or a sign of brain damage.

Typically this involves something to do with their ever-growing list of mental illnesses (it's kwalled not bweing a neuwotypical DAAAAAD!), their mind-blowing knowledge of Wikipedia, their adherence to various holier-than-thou Internet ideologies (which however revolve entirely around online preening, and seemingly preclude real-world action), their hatred of the vapid sluts who ignored them throughout all of high school (fuckin' women!), their habit of regurgitating meaningless phrases, and their ability to perform very minor janitorial work on the computer.  

That last one, which is more the result of them wasting hours on the Internet than a sign of giftedness (see the completely broken state of the online world, which has been built by these same geniuses), they view as a key that unlocks mastery over every subject on Earth, despite never reading, learning, or doing anything.

In fact, you will be astonished at the level of smug contempt that they have for every job and subject on Earth, and you will be equally astonished by the basic ignorance they have of every job and subject on Earth-- truly an impressive combination! 

If the nerds were capable of creativity, and had an art form, it would be more than anything else the revenge fantasy-- bitter masturbation is all they are really capable of-- and this is the only area of life where the rejects do show signs of creativity, intelligence, and originality. 

All nerd sub-cultures, ie most of the Internet, are defined by their endless fixation with punishing others. 

The fact that they can only fantasize about harming other people, never doing anything good or praiseworthy, is revealing of what the core of nerdiness really is, which is just a profound degree of self-absorption (bordering on autism or sociopathy). They are simply not capable of making genuine connections with others, and they worship themselves to such a degree that social integration into a larger unit than their individual selves is impossible. 

Rather than view their basic failure to adjust to reality as indicative of some deficit on their part, and work on fixing themselves to be more aligned with the world, the retarded nerds blame reality instead, and then spend their entire lives seething about the fact, concocting theories to explain it, and waiting for everyone else to realize how smart they are (this never happens, which is what masturbation is for).  

6 reasons why this right-wing edgelord loves Jews, and why you bigots should too!

God, I can't believe I have to write this post. 

My entire feed is flooded with Russian misinformation, made by low IQ morons for other low IQ morons.

I'm literally shaking rn*, asking myself how this could have happened, with everything the Jews have done for America, but those ungrateful assholes among the goyim apparently can't see it though...

Me (he/him, 45M) and my husband (he/him, 51M, gay, Jewish) decided to make a list, and it's got a LOT of science in it, in order to debunk this misinformation once and for all. 

So yeah, let's unpack this:

1. Jews never bullied me in high school, unlike brutish low-IQ negroids

I've discussed this previously. Unfortunately I was victimized, spat on, laughed, taunted, beaten, slapped, traumatized, and ritually abused every day of every week for the seven and a half years I spent in high school-- and especially by blacks.

Something about being fat, gay, retarded, autistic, short, awkward, creepy, and weird at the same time just didn't resonate with the fucking vapid normals... God, low-IQ neurotypicals, amirite?

It's only when I started to read about the experiences of the great Jewish people, and the profound and unjustified suffering inflicted upon them by the jealous masses, that I realized I'd found the closest thing to someone who could understand me.

(That's also when I met my husband, in case anyone is curious.) 

2. Jews provide me with all the porn I need, in the comfort of my home

Uhmm, so yeah, I just went there.

I can feel some traditionalists out there getting ready to pervert-shame-- well listen up, deniers, SCIENCE says it's healthy, there's nothing wrong with watching 8 + hrs of hardcore porn a day like I do.  

It's just part of living a natural and well-balanced lifestyle, not something those right-wing bigots would know anything about, heh... 

And you wouldn't want to live without your crippling porn addiction, would you? Hmmm? 

Exactly, be grateful.

3. Jews are law-abiding, according to Wikipedia

If it says it on there, it must be true. 

And yeah I do read a lot of Wikipedia, that's where I get all of my views from, in case you can't tell. I'm kind of a quirky, high IQ, nerd-- there aren't a lot of us around these days, but it's our job to fight disinformation, and spread the truth.  

(And no, I don't know any math or science or history, but who cares about that anyways?) 

Get obliterated by FUCKING SCIENCE, racists. Case closed!

4. OK fine they do commit some crimes, but they have a high IQ, and what's a little bit of crime anyways?

A lot of goyim reading this are feeling kinda jealous, I'm guessing, of those with superior incomes and financial success in life.  

Too low IQ, too busy working on cars and doing other numbskull activities, to make something of your intellectual potential? Resentful much, Christians? 

Yeah, I for one can appreciate and admire the benefits of high-IQ pointless financial speculation and child trafficking-- that's the Jewish way of doing things, and if you bigots can't appreciate it, well then that says everything we need to know. 

5. It's literally fucking 2026

That's it, that's the argument.

Also just stop asking questions. 

And you have a low IQ, BTW.

6. Uh

 

*I'm guessing a lot of you Boomers and older folks reading are feeling a little bit confused by what I'm talking about, hehe--that's kind of a youth-slang term we use, which stands for 'right now'.

The 'doom porn' phenomenon

I'm thinking about writing a series addressing the various diseases Internet People have, but from the point of view of explaining them all through some kind of sociological view (rather than placing individual responsibility, or blame, or whatever)-- something about the rising levels of autism, widespread alienation due to social breakdown, or the erosion of local institutions and their replacement by amoral market forces... the point is look at the bigger picture.

But first and as a special case I wanted to discuss the general 'doom porn' phenomenon, now that I've been poasting about climate change in particular, since it seems relevant.

Rather than viewing it as a unique phenomenon, I think it can mainly be explained by the general model of addictive behavior.

What happens with very severe cases of addiction is that the mind and body of the addict are effectively consumed, hollowed out, and taken over-- rather than the person being in control, they are more like an empty vessel that lives solely to chase after stronger and stronger doses (before the eventual collapse occurs). 

This process is accompanied of course by the withdrawal from or abandonment of all social relationships, which goes in hand with their hollowed-out personality: contrary to Self Esteem fantasies, and a lot of Internet nonsense, one's personality is largely the result of interactions and relationships with others, not a Platonic ideal that exists apart from or above mundane reality.

Abandoning social ties results in personal disintegration, in which a healthy personal life is replaced with fetishes and obsessions.

This is why addicts view criticism of their addictions as an existential threat, and lash out accordingly. It's very different from how normal people treat criticism of their habits, but makes sense under the circumstances: their addiction has become their personality.

With that in mind, much of the whole 'doom porn' & climate change movement starts to make sense. 

It's revealing that the name itself is derived from an pornography, an obsessive pointless fetish, rather than anything scholarly or scientific or spiritual or religious (despite the branding).

The actual process of participating in 'the movement' (more of a cult) consists of consuming your weekly / daily fix in individual isolation, with no long term satisfaction or communal bonding, though there may be other junkies present-- no different from a chemical addiction.  

And revealingly, the majority of the climate change people themselves have a history of hardcore substance abuse: addictive in one facet of life usually means addictive in others. (Whether the personality leads to substance abuse, or the substance abuse leads to that kind of personality, is beyond the scope of the post.)

I don't say this to slander them personally, but to point out what they have in common-- the fact that substance abuse is so widespread in those circles, compared to the normal population, is indicative of the nature of the whole thing.

You might expect people with such problems would act in a humble manner, as opposed to the puritanical scolding and lecturing that the Greens are famous for, but there is a strange overlap between hedonism, transgression, and anti-social behavior and a victim / superiority complex-- they seem to reinforce each other.

The Green pats himself on the shoulder as he lashes out at you, or something like that... 

Their response to criticism is never mild amusement (as it would be if you were arguing against largely accepted scientific facts, like evolution) and nor does it take the tone of neutral academic disagreement, which would still be respectful of the opponent, while treating him as wrong / deluded / misinformed. 

Rather it takes the form of seething dismissal, intense hostility, and branding the opponent in highly moralistic terms. It implies personal sinfulness and wickedness, and suggests imminent punishment-- it's both the panicked response of a junkie whose habit is going to be taken away, and who must lash out to prevent internal collapse, and also the behavior of a self-appointed torturer looking for an excuse to indulge in cruelty. 

Examining the broader beliefs of the climate change people also reveals them to be more into pseudo-scientific Cargo Cult slop rather than anything rooted in reality, once again suggesting the 'science' part is a pure LARP-- there's a widespread belief in these circles in things like magical healing substances (even as we know there is a clear link between cannabis use, and substances in general, and schizophrenia), sentient computers, new sources of free limitless energy (none of which work), fixing pollution from from Asia by building windmills in Germany, and generally a lot of disordered, confused, and incoherent thinking. 

This is, once again, not to pick on them individually, but to establish that people who show sloppy thinking on the micro level are not going to be reliable for macro-level stuff, all of which requires an even greater level of consistency, rigor, and impartiality. 

Taking the r/collapse subreddit as an example, a lot of the thinking 'in action' essentially boils down to hysterically exaggerating the hell out of a handful of insights or observations, usually based off whatever the current trend is in the news now, and then using that to feed the addiction to imminent doom.  

Something like this:

1. Current trend

2. Another current trend

3. Extrapolation

4. Hysterical prediction of imminent apocalypse, based off of extrapolation

They start off with a solid structure and then go on to build something that is very flimsy on top of that.  

Examples? 

1. COVID vaccines didn't work

2. COVID has not been eliminated (b/c vaccines didn't work)

3. More people are being re-infected, and excess mortality remains elevated

4. 60% of the population will soon be dead

Or:

1. Micro-plastics are everywhere

2. Micro-plastics are likely harmful for individuals, and for the environment

3. Micro-plastics affect the soil

4. Human agriculture will fail, and most of the population will soon be dead of starvation

(Another trick is to refute criticism by bringing it back to points 1 & 2, as if the critics were disagreeing with the data itself and arguing against reality, when it's the exaggerated extrapolation that people naturally find suspicious, overly paranoid, and unscientific.)

It's remarkable how many times human society has almost collapsed, in these people's eyes-- as their subreddit grows and grows (and r/ collapse is just one example) the number of apocalyptic predictions also increases exponentially, and this makes the way society manages to keep on going, in spite of imminent doom, all the more miraculous. 

Many of them go on to produce a fantastic track record of apocalyptic predictions, which are always on the verge of coming true (and which therefore can never be falsified). Addicts exist in an eternal present, and being on an endless treadmill to nowhere in particular, they cannot take stock of their previous or future behavior.   

I can only conclude that it's as if the breakdown of societal order is creating a new group of gurus who make a living off of people's widespread personal problems, which are in turn the result of collective collapse.

In exchange for cult leader status, donations, and clicks they provide their desperate followers with what they crave-- in this case, the overwhelming sense of imminent doom, which perhaps allows the desperate people to envision an easy way out of their own lives, or excuse their own passivity and laziness.

Why I rarely discuss climate change

I rarely discuss climate change, because I consider the entire thing to be a kind of slop subject, an Internet fixation for online nerds, and possibly one of the worst of them (worse than even the JOOS). 

Nothing good can come from bringing it up, because the worst Internet people come crawling out of the woodwork-- whiny hysterical weirdos with a doom fetish and an addiction to puritanical lecturing and scolding: they view you as an embodiment of the people that never invited them to any parties in high school and college, and they view the subject as an opportunity for revenge, finally. 

The sensible thing, therefore, is to avoid it altogether and never get into any debates on it.  

Whether they consciously intend it or not (probably not since they don't seem very smart, more spergy than anything else) the climate people often seem to function as a kind of controlled opposition to the dominant neoliberal agenda of endless growth. 

It's revealing that they don't focus their energy on practical changes, and building a coalition of allies to bring down the entire framework of the last 50 years, but instead fixate on fighting the people on their side (who may be disaffected with endless growth, but who do not want austerity either). 

They're ultimately entirely concerned with tone-policing, witch-hunting, scolding, mocking, and lecturing and they try to turn every engagement into a debate where they make fun of you, rather than build engagement, cement any connections, or whatever-- it's all just whiny tattletale, power-tripping, and bootlicking behavior. 

It's the self-appointed (and probably unpaid) hall monitors of the global elite, using the current crisis of the system as an opportunity to indulge in their revenge-of-the-nerds type fantasies.

Many of these people envision the collapse in a karmic sense. They have an endless amount of cynicism for the future of the system, but they suspend all of that when it comes to the future that will take place after The Fall: everything will be wonderful, the wicked will be punished (everybody who hated me IRL, ie most people) and the virtuous will be rewarded (me and the other annoying nerds). 

Ironically enough, the actual collapse of law, order, authority, etc ultimately always results in a ruthless struggle for power and resources between competing factions (Syria, Latin America, etc)-- in which case it's precisely the power-tripping skinnyfat nerds who would be forcibly RETVRN'd to their natural environment (the high school lockers): they're not physically skilled enough to know how to do anything practical, they're too clever-silly / smart-dumb to be trusted with anything complex, and even if they somehow had any skills their whiny, self-focused, and anti-social personalities ensure that they can only thrive as bootlickers in a massive top-down system, whereas any real-world team would immediately ostracize them.

Getting back to the real-world, though, this continuous purge of the left ensures that the average voter is presented with two alternatives: delusional huckster growth by globalist scammers nobody trusts or, on the other hand, privation 'for your own good' administered by the beneficent globalist elites, who happen not to practice a single aspect of their ideology (private planes, mansions, and caviar for me; public transportation, overcrowded apartments, and slop for you!). As I said, it obstructs change while LARPing as radicalism.

The climate people also love to cry and rage and whine about the evil knevil WHITE MAN and his domination of the world, desire to rape Mother Nature (don't ask about their weird fetishes), and so on and so forth-- just endless lamentations-- but then of course they say nothing about the tremendous rise in emissions from 3rd-world countries that's taken place since the 80s, and is still going strong in the 21st century, thanks to off-shoring during the neoliberal era.

The system they have in mind is one where the average worker in some shithole post-industrial service economy in Britain or France or wherever will have his entire routine micro-analyzed and carefully scrutinized by overpaid bureaucrats with useless college degrees-- is this food good for the environment? what about eating chemicals instead? could you give up this? what about not having a car?-- while China, India, and Vietnam (and the global corporations that have off-shored production there) operate massive sweatshops which dump endless tons of garbage into the environment, with zero regulations over anything, and nobody does or even says anything about it (let alone the brave climate warriors). 

Somehow they inhabit a fantastic world where the continent of Europe showing lower emissions, and the continent of Asia having higher emissions, is just a random accident-- as if they weren't DIRECTLY LINKED TO EACH OTHER-- nah just a total coincidence, nothing to see here, but make sure to throw your trash into one of sixteen different bins (while we off-shore your job to some sweatshop) and pay this new tax we're going to introduce (now that American manufacturing in Vietnam is destroying the environment).

Then they accuse their opponents of being anti-science and having low IQs.

It's really the ultimate product of neoliberal delusion, a fake & gay ideology built on a hallucination-- it's somehow self-contradicting, deeply retarded, socially alienating, and impossible to bring about, and all of those AT THE SAME TIME too!