It's interesting to look at how much of Jewish art and culture revolves around being a neurotic, weird, misunderstood misfit whose anxious obsessions prevent him from enjoying the basic aspects of everyday life that most people can 'get' unconsciously -- like dating, flirting, humor, small talk, dancing, and so on. Woody Allen, Philip Roth (off the top of my head -- but there are others).
Gentile societies also produce people like that, such as the pitiful cast of a Dostoevsky novel or Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver, but they're nowhere near as big of a fraction of the population as they are among Jews.
And I get the sense that the same goes for other behaviors which are warped and 'out there' like homosexuality, child abuse, drug abuse, sexual deviance (Jews are also overrepresented in the porn industry), and so on -- unfortunately there are no studies, so I can't back this up (should some offended nerd come asking for evidence) but these things do seem to be more common among the Master Race than they are among gentile populations.
I've heard it said that their personalities account for their over-representation among major intellectuals in the hard sciences (and not just their higher-than-average IQs and consequent over-representation in the tails of the distribution) -- namely they are more anti-social, psychotic, disagreeable, and unconscientious, a set of traits which can be summarized as psychoticism. They are more likely to disregard the consensus, hold nothing sacred, blaze a new trail, etc.
In our degenerate era, the biggest crime is being normal, following the rules, working hard, being altruistic, etc -- so of course nobody thinks that there could be significant downsides from this. In fact, based on the standard theory, you'd expect them to be overrepresented in the tails of those personality traits: there will be far more Jews at the extremes of what we would regard as extremely sacrilegious, anti-social, parasitic, behavior, than there would Gentiles. Their long history of scandals and abuses would seem to support this conclusion.
This also makes me wonder if there isn't some kind of threshold beyond which, as intelligence increases, so do all kinds of other weird and bizarre behaviors. Or perhaps that, as unscientific as it sounds, this growth (especially in Ashkenazi Jews) also comes at the expense of other areas which are underdeveloped or defunded, in order for the rational / logical / cerebral lobe to grow super-powered. Kind of like how increases in height are a good thing, but only up to a certain point, at which point they correlate with lower fitness, shorter life expectancy, etc.
And while I also think the stereotype of the loner / misunderstood genius has been *massively* over-exaggerated, largely in order to inflate the egos of unaccomplished dorks ('he's just like me fr'), it does seem to be the case that you find way more problematic / strange behaviors when you look at the peaks of achievement in art or mathematics or physics or what have you, compared to the normal population.
The fact that weirdness actually becomes more common is a major 'tell' that perhaps maximally increasing IQ in one big eugenics program may not be as wonderful or amazing as the IQ nerds and wannabe social engineers who worship it as the be-all-end-all metric assure us it will be -- is it really worthwhile, if greater levels of intellectual achievement also come at the expense of becoming weirder, more perverted, and more and more incapable of understanding basic human social behavior?
Another area where Jews are seem to be actually handicapped compared to Gentiles is in visual-spatial skills (not important for white-collar work) -- there is actually evidence that they may even score lower than Gentiles on such tests.
ReplyDeleteThey certainly don't seem to be as accomplished in sculpture, painting, and I think (to a lesser extent perhaps?) in cinematography. (The latter could go either way, since it's just as much about themes, screenwriting, dialogue, etc as it is about composition, color, visual rhythms and patterns. So a visually unaccomplished person could skirt by as a director, while relying on someone else for that aspect of the production.)
Also, in fairness, Western Euro visual art peaked when the Master Race was still getting whipped by cossacks in Smolenkskskskksksks, so it's not like they had much of a chance of contributing to it; but still, even if they had been around, I'm not sure how well they would have done. They certainly seem to be overrepresented among film critics and art critics who have no fucking clue what is going on, and concoct grandiose theories hyping up mediocre / stale / unimpressive slop.
The Jewish mind in general seems to have a particular aversion to succinct, intuitive, statements that tap into your observational skills, as opposed to explicit verbal reasons, logical chains, etc. Like, 'they don't make 'em like that anymore' -- and other things which are more like folk wisdom, rather than philosophy; for whatever reason these seem to really offend them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Willis
ReplyDelete""It's hard to believe, but a lot of directors have no visual sense. They only have a storytelling sense. If a director is smart, he'll give me the elbow room to paint"
I'm not even a big Jewish Question guy, or obsessively into conspiracy theories, but this Jew-worshiping slop gets tiresome -- just cuz they MAX OUT some metric or another, doesn't mean they're perfect. And the more you accuse other people of being inferior, the more perfect you should be -- if you don't like it when we point out your flaws, then don't talk all this shit, or try and pass yourself off as above everyone else.
ReplyDeleteNot to mention that the whole racial stuff is really heading in the direction of the Heritage Foundation 2.0, which is what is actually motivating and driving this slop: rebranding the oligarchs' decision to replace the native population with foreign competitors as based, by appealing to IQstats and other metrics.
When they discuss intelligence, they give you the impression that they worship the superior, the successful, the accomplished, un-mediocre, and bla bla bla... but they never actually look up to or imitate anyone with intellectual accomplishments, since they don't really care for any aspect of culture in general. It really just means hyping up the latest wave of yuppie scammers -- whether native or foreign born, white or brown, low or high IQ -- in order to try and justify the obscene levels of wealth inequality as natural and good, rather than unnatural and evil.
That's why they whine so much about the dreadful low IQs, the resentful, the low status -- their way of trying to blame the audience. It's no different from conservatards off-shoring the economy, then blaming the people who were left behind, 'You just have victim mentality / are retarded / lack willpower, unlike some super-human Darwinian ubermensch who rug-pulled his away to wealth, or did some shit with crypto-coins, or whatever.'
Insane levels of wealth inequality strike the human mind as unfair: justifying them requires lionizing the mediocre scammers as larger-than-life superheroes, while slandering everyone else as resentful, inferior, losers.
Then like most libertarians, these so-called 'Darwinian survivors' have a second instinct when it comes to finding sinecures, and making sure they are NOT exposed to free-for-all competition -- in this case clearly the Thiel / Musk right-wing slopaganda slushfund, lol. But what else would you expect from a movement of servile cucks and dutiful slaves?
Quite frankly, the more these guys take over the right / GOP, the more I miss the Boomercon years of the GOP: at least those guys were pretending to be in it to help out the 3rd world by enlightening the savages with democracy and the free market. These Millennial losers can't even rise to the level of having a vision (however cynical in practice): it's just sheer nihilism and destructiveness, for the sake of nihilism and destructiveness.
ReplyDeleteAnd so I unironically think that the biggest way to discredit them would simply be to give them some power and influence, at which point they would turn out to be identical in behavior to the Trump Cult and other neo-neo-neoconservatives -- just with the usual edgy meme branding -- and promptly go down in flames.
Iconoclastic, pushing the boundaries of science (by regurgitating Steve Sailer), provocative thinking, anti-establishment -- these guys' egos got so inflated that they thought that just because they weren't seething fighting-against-reality delusional woketard nut, that made automatically made them cool and based and hip, lol.
Except of course when you discover that they're in favor of going to war with Iran, think you should eat bugs for Israel like an obedient goyslave, and want you replaced by cheap labor from the 3rd world too, lol!
Hopefully young people start to realize that edgy memes are perfectly compatible with, and perhaps a necessary part of, the Establishment's agenda, and tune out of that garbage for good.